Go back
Opening to middlegame transition

Opening to middlegame transition

Only Chess

mchill
Cryptic

Behind the scenes

Joined
27 Jun 16
Moves
3283
Clock
29 Jan 19
Vote Up
Vote Down

Many times in tournament play my opponent and myself manage the opening well, pieces are developed, kings castled, rooks connected, position even, no obvious weaknesses to exploit in the opponent's camp, and book theory is exhausted etc.

What now??

If I were in a snarky mood, I say something like: "Now you have to think!" While this is true enough, I often wonder how others here proceed when there seems to be no good moves, and no clear attacking chances for either side, as the opening ends, and the middle game begins.

Any thoughts??

roe

Joined
29 Jan 19
Moves
22
Clock
29 Jan 19
Vote Up
Vote Down

Lasker's manual is 100 years old but it is still good. He explained that you attack the weakness in your opponents position. Finding that weakness is the hard part. All of this seems obvious and it is obvious but hard to do.
The book is cheap but good.

roe

Joined
29 Jan 19
Moves
22
Clock
29 Jan 19
Vote Up
Vote Down

I'm only 1600 like you so I have the same problem.

HikaruShindo

Joined
08 Apr 12
Moves
68553
Clock
30 Jan 19
Vote Up
Vote Down

There are a lot of helpful books on the subject, one already mentioned, but I often find it helpful to run down a list of prioritized considerations. Even if it's not enumerated so strictly, there's a process we all use to make our next move. When there's not an obvious move that seems exciting, as you've described, I try to address this list more deliberately. In particular, I often find that there's a piece I'd rather reposition, or a pawn break I can work towards. Increasing my intentionality can force me into a move. It's not the most clear advice, I suppose, but maybe it's useful.

venda
Dave

S.Yorks.England

Joined
18 Apr 10
Moves
86173
Clock
30 Jan 19
Vote Up
Vote Down

@mchill said
Many times in tournament play my opponent and myself manage the opening well, pieces are developed, kings castled, rooks connected, position even, no obvious weaknesses to exploit in the opponent's camp, and book theory is exhausted etc.

What now??

If I were in a snarky mood, I say something like: "Now you have to think!" While this is true enough, I often wonder how oth ...[text shortened]... tacking chances for either side, as the opening ends, and the middle game begins.

Any thoughts??
I agree with you.Without having a photographic memory for lots of positions you have to rely on gut feelings I think.When you read the chess columns they say things like "in 1857 in this position such and such played ne6 or something which to me is totally unhelpful.
I just tend to try and work out what my opponent is planning, if there are any weaknesses(backward pawns, blocked in bishops etc)and try to exploit them or rectify them if they're my weaknesses.
There's also standard things like putting rooks on semi open files, not over exposing your king and not attacking too early but as you say , not easy.

ketchuplover
Isolated Pawn

Wisconsin USA

Joined
09 Dec 01
Moves
71666
Clock
30 Jan 19
Vote Up
Vote Down

Perhaps we need to start looking for weaknesses on the furthest rank and move back towards us.

Paul Leggett
Chess Librarian

The Stacks

Joined
21 Aug 09
Moves
114054
Clock
30 Jan 19
Vote Up
Vote Down

@mchill
The best weaknesses to exploit are the ones that are NOT obvious. Among other things, it adds surprise to your quiver of arrows.

moonbus
Über-Nerd (emeritus)

Joined
31 May 12
Moves
8703
Clock
31 Jan 19
Vote Up
Vote Down

@mchill

You will find the answer to your question in Herman Grooten's "Chess Strategy for Club Players."

mchill
Cryptic

Behind the scenes

Joined
27 Jun 16
Moves
3283
Clock
31 Jan 19
Vote Up
Vote Down

@moonbus said
@mchill

You will find the answer to your question in Herman Grooten's "Chess Strategy for Club Players."
Thank You. I'll give it a try. 🙂

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.