1. Joined
    24 Aug '07
    Moves
    48477
    04 Oct '09 16:48
    This is a continuation of Thread 118849.

    Our 43. ... h4 was met by 44. Rd1.

    Here is the position with black to move:



    Here is the entire game:

  2. Standard memberclandarkfire
    Grammar Nazi
    Auschwitz
    Joined
    03 Apr '06
    Moves
    44348
    04 Oct '09 17:05
    I vote we play h6 and offer a draw
  3. e4
    Joined
    06 May '08
    Moves
    42492
    04 Oct '09 17:10
    Look Out

  4. Joined
    25 Apr '06
    Moves
    5939
    04 Oct '09 17:273 edits
    Why would we offer a draw
  5. Standard memberclandarkfire
    Grammar Nazi
    Auschwitz
    Joined
    03 Apr '06
    Moves
    44348
    04 Oct '09 17:281 edit
    Originally posted by greenpawn34
    [b]Look Out

    [pgn]
    [Event "Edited position"]
    [Site "END-CFB10B3985E"]
    [Date "2009.10.04"]
    [Round "-"]
    [White "-"]
    [Black "-"]
    [Result "1-0"]
    [FEN "3R4/p4p1k/r5p1/1N4P1/P6p/1KP2P2/6n1/8 w - - 0 1"]
    [SetUp "1"]

    {--------------
    . . . R . . . .
    p . . . . p . k
    r . . . . . p .
    . N . . . . P .
    P . . . . . . p
    . K P . . P . .
    . . . . . ...[text shortened]... 2. Nc7 Ra5 3. Ne8 h2 4. Rd8 h1=Q 5. Nf6+ Kg7 6. Rg8#
    {White mates} 1-0[/pgn][/b]
    Nice line, but we would be winning easily if we play Rxg5 after either Ne8 or Rd8.

    Edit - I've been beaten to it
  6. Joined
    23 May '08
    Moves
    3988
    04 Oct '09 18:41
    I think the point still stands that we need to be wary of the rook and knights ability to mate and tactics which might arise because if this

    We have played this game very well so far, it would be a shame to lose in this kind of way. Fairly certain we won't though! All these great chess minds at work...
  7. Joined
    02 Oct '08
    Moves
    7473
    04 Oct '09 21:46
    Maybe 44 .. h3 45.Rh1 Nf4
  8. Joined
    01 Oct '08
    Moves
    13897
    04 Oct '09 22:16
    why bother with h3? I suggest h1 straight 🙂
  9. Joined
    11 Jul '09
    Moves
    43994
    04 Oct '09 23:23
    We should just keep the rook for the sac. at the sixth rank.
  10. San Francisco, CA US
    Joined
    09 Jan '07
    Moves
    182561
    05 Oct '09 00:16
    How about Rf6. The point is to next move Rf1 and White must trade rooks or get off of the 1st rank. If he trades rook, we promote the h pawn and win. If he vacates the 1st rank, our two pieces should be able to escort the h pawn to promotion or force White to exchange the rook for the h pawn. Either result wins for us.

    If he attacks our knight with his rook, h3 protects the knight while advancing the h pawn. If he then moves to h1, ..Nf4 protects the h pawn until the rook on the f file can come to the rescue.

    If White opts to snatch our a pawn, we promote the h-pawn before he can promote his a pawn which will be blocked for a move by the knight.
  11. Joined
    17 Feb '07
    Moves
    4779
    05 Oct '09 02:59
    I think the above user means Re6 and Re1.
  12. Joined
    11 Jul '09
    Moves
    43994
    05 Oct '09 04:00
    Our friend got a good idea.


    it may worth a try, let's analyse it.
  13. San Francisco, CA US
    Joined
    09 Jan '07
    Moves
    182561
    05 Oct '09 04:57
    Originally posted by queen5792
    I think the above user means Re6 and Re1.
    e, f, what's the diff?

    Thank you. I took a bogey on that one.
  14. Joined
    29 Aug '09
    Moves
    1574
    05 Oct '09 06:03
    I vote 44...Re6
  15. Joined
    15 Jun '06
    Moves
    16334
    05 Oct '09 09:49
    Isn't it funny how similar that idea is to 43...Ne1? plus We shouldn't try to trade rooks we should try to put the knight on e1 or if he moves his rook to h1 we have to find a way of limiting its moves because if we move the rook to e1 he can move his rook to h2 and we lose our pawn. this would have been avoided had we played 43...Ne1. Yes I will rub it in because ...h4 was a terrible move, it limits our knight and it makes the pawn a target which will tie our pieces to defense(worst thing for a piece in an endgame) and he will be threatening to promote.
Back to Top

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.I Agree