Last night I was given the dubious honour of playing board 1 for the University in the top local division. It meant I was playing my highest ever graded opponent (134 v 173 - I believe his FIDE grade is 2046). I tried to remember all the wisdom about him starting with the same pieces as me and making him prove he was better. The game ended in a draw after a serious time scamble. He got into time trouble by move 20 and I reciprocated by about move 35. The PGN goes further though the end is incomplete although someone was kind enough to keep the score and I hope to get it sometime soon. Endgame mistakes I can see for myself now, but in the middle I find it hard to see improvements. Engines can objectively say x is better than y but can anyone here offer actual plans or give specific reasons for why a continuation is better than what I played?
The game was a draw and finished with less than a minute each in this position:
Any input would be welcome 🙂
Edit: In the cold light of day 29. Nh3+ is just clearly better than 29. h4+ 🙁
Hi Meadows.
Good OTB game. Yes Meph is right there was a smashing position waiting for you
but clock ticking, higher graded opponent, you may become more worried
about what he can do than what you can do.
You will learn some chess from this game but mentally it has toughened you up.
You know what happens next? You will lose to a 1500 player.
It happens. Chess can be so cruel.
Heinzkat has posted some glorious wins v higher graded players.
2 IM's and a GM!
http://heinzk.blogspot.com/