1. Joined
    16 Oct '09
    Moves
    2448
    29 Jul '10 19:08
    yes. 4 mins.
  2. Joined
    20 Jul '10
    Moves
    1072
    29 Jul '10 19:191 edit
    😠 No illegal positions.
  3. Joined
    26 Oct '06
    Moves
    11724
    29 Jul '10 20:23
    yes, 6ish minutes
  4. Joined
    20 Feb '05
    Moves
    1977
    29 Jul '10 23:56
    If there's no white king on the board, then the position is always going to be illegal.

    No, 5 minutes plus.
  5. Joined
    20 Feb '05
    Moves
    1977
    30 Jul '10 00:09
    Ah, just got it. Was trying to see the position in my head but couldn't, had to set it up on a board before I found it.
  6. e4
    Joined
    06 May '08
    Moves
    42492
    30 Jul '10 00:382 edits
    Thanks lads that will do.

    Got a bucket load of PM's with the answer or not the answer because
    some people thought it was a GP joke and did not want to set
    themseleves for riddicule.

    It's not a joke. And if you did not get it, it's OK.
    (some very good players have failed).

    Next blog posted later on today will reveal all and the reason.
    I have been showing that wee puzzle for over 25 years to players of
    varying strength from GM's downwards.

    Right now I've got to get some sleep.

    (I'll play some blitz first)....🙁

    Pity one or two dropped a hint. I knew someone would.
    (so expect to see your biggest blunder posted very soon on here) 😉

    Thanks again.


    Edit 1: 9 players in the Blitz room - we have to get that room filled up.
    Rated games should do it or at least show the W.D.L's.
    Going to bed.
  7. Standard memberSwissGambit
    Caninus Interruptus
    2014.05.01
    Joined
    11 Apr '07
    Moves
    92274
    30 Jul '10 00:45
    Originally posted by greenpawn34
    (so expect to see your biggest blunder posted very soon on here) 😉
    I hung a Rook for mate in one against a 1200 player.

    If that's not a whopper, I don't know what is.
  8. SubscriberPaul Leggett
    Chess Librarian
    The Stacks
    Joined
    21 Aug '09
    Moves
    113545
    30 Jul '10 02:12
    Originally posted by SwissGambit
    I hung a Rook for mate in one against a 1200 player.

    If that's not a whopper, I don't know what is.
    We should get together and write a book.
  9. Joined
    30 Jul '10
    Moves
    0
    30 Jul '10 03:46

    This post is unavailable.

    Please refer to our posting guidelines.

  10. Joined
    29 Dec '08
    Moves
    6788
    30 Jul '10 05:33
    Yes, one minute or so.

    Followup: Demonstrate a legal way to arrive at the position.
  11. e4
    Joined
    06 May '08
    Moves
    42492
    30 Jul '10 11:15
    Hi SG.

    It was not a Rook you hung, you left your King en prise.

    White to play.



    Not a bad move though.
    19...Ng4 hitting the Queen and threatening a mate on h2.
    One slight drawback,.....

    My recent one. I've just played 23.Qg3-h3.



    I meant 23.Qh4+ this is my clumiest move to date and was long over due
    after all the prattling on I do about a pre-send check.

    Chess advice always returns to haunt you and practising what you
    preach is very very hard.

    (I was actually posting and writing my blog whilst playing games - the irony).

    Mu opponent must have thought I was a nutter because I sent a draw
    offer with this move. 🙂
  12. Joined
    11 Feb '04
    Moves
    6480
    30 Jul '10 16:46
    Yes. 4 mins, 50 secs!
  13. Joined
    27 Jul '10
    Moves
    4382
    02 Aug '10 18:56
    Yes, two minutes
  14. Joined
    16 Oct '09
    Moves
    2448
    02 Aug '10 19:05
    Now that everything was revealed, I'll give out my thinking process for this one. I was trying to solve it conventionally, playing around with the rooks and the knight. after a few mins I found that it wasn't working. So you have to think outside the box.

    I got it 10 seconds after I started to think about the problem this way.

    - you need to cover 9 squares, the king itself + the 8 surrounding squares.

    - The knight can only cover two escape squares from the king(or put him in check while covering one square), no matter how you place it.

    -Which way can you place the rooks to cover 7 squares (without hanging themselves)? The answer comes very quickly afterward.
  15. e4
    Joined
    06 May '08
    Moves
    42492
    02 Aug '10 21:051 edit
    Forgot to add solutions here are all 4 - Cheers Max.

    Try it out amongst other players.
    It's surpising how often less experinced players get it so quickly
    and yet stronger players struggle.

    Now you have it, like other patterns you have messed about with,
    you will take it to your grave.

    Let me know if the opportunity to use it in a game crops up. 😉

    Thanks again everyone who took part.







Back to Top

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.I Agree