Go back
Proved Wrong Again....

Proved Wrong Again....

Only Chess

Clock
3 edits

...Mind you, I was only two years old at the time.

I've often said it's nigh impossible to lose a game if you have doubled Rooks on the 7th rank.

The 1953 Scottish Championship was won by J.Aitken with a peferct score p.8 W.8.
Second came one Erwin Knopfler (the father Mark and David Knopfler who
form the backbone of Dire Straights) with 5 pts.

In the game R. Donald v J.Aitken this positon appeared.


White to play has a straight forward draw by just keep on checking with the f7 Rook.
Instead he makes a plausible blunder and resigns after Black's reply.

Clock

White must have played Rxb7 and resigned after black played Rxb2+. Ouch.

Clock
Vote Up
Vote Down

That is indeed what happened.

1.Rxb7 Rxb2+


All four Rooks are in one or another attacked.
White comes out of it a Rook down.

Clock
Vote Up
Vote Down

"I've been wrong one time. I thought I had made a mistake, but I didn't." ChessPraxis Senior

Chess wise it is so easy to be misguided or deceived, it's all part of the game. One person can not see it all, all the time.

Clock
1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

This might fit this thread on being proved wrong 😕 (Trippled pawns are bad) and also it has a similar "Rook Mexican Standoff" to the OP game. It's fascinating what odd crazy stuff can happen once both players have pieces hanging.

Clock
1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by greenpawn34
I've often said it's nigh impossible to lose a game if you have doubled Rooks on the 7th rank.

Just finished a game when I had a rook and queen on the 7th rank and lost


Clock
1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Clock
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by hedonist
Just finished a game when I had a rook and queen on the 7th rank and lost


[pgn][Event "Open invite"] [Site "http://www.redhotpawn.com"] [Date "2013.08.11"] [EndDate "2013.08.30"] [Round "?"] [White "Academus"] [Black "hedonist"] [WhiteRating "1783"] [BlackRating "1602"] [WhiteElo "1783"] [BlackElo "1602"] [Result "1-0"] [GameId "10167584"] 1. e4 e5 2 ...[text shortened]... ing a discovered check but Rb5 scuppers that.} 32. Qg5xe3 1-0 [/pgn]
The pgn reader doesn't seem to like it if you take the new-lines out between the tags

Clock
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by hedonist
Just finished a game when I had a rook and queen on the 7th rank and lost


[pgn][Event "Open invite"] [Site "http://www.redhotpawn.com"] [Date "2013.08.11"] [EndDate "2013.08.30"] [Round "?"] [White "Academus"] [Black "hedonist"] [WhiteRating "1783"] [BlackRating "1602"] [WhiteElo "1783"] [BlackElo "1602"] [Result "1-0"] [GameId "10167584"] 1. e4 e5 2 ...[text shortened]... ing a discovered check but Rb5 scuppers that.} 32. Qg5xe3 1-0 [/pgn]
SwissGambit's PGN fix-it service© to the rescue.

Clock
Vote Up
Vote Down

You can wait all day for a pgn engineer then two come along at once. Thanks guys. 😀

I pasted it from the Knightvision pgn viewer which seems to want to give me a headache.

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.