Go back
Queen Sac

Queen Sac

Only Chess

c

USA

Joined
22 Dec 05
Moves
13780
Clock
08 Jul 09
Vote Up
Vote Down

Just finished an interesting 5 minute game with a queen sacrifice. I think it was sound, but I haven't done any deep analysis. Enjoy.

[Event "uChess rated"]
[Site "www.uchess.com"]
[Date "2009.7.8"]
[Round "?"]
[White "chesskid001"]
[Black "thinkingaboutit"]
[Result "1-0"]

G

Joined
16 Nov 06
Moves
9787
Clock
08 Jul 09
Vote Up
Vote Down

12. Pd5 is mate on the spot, your queens sac was correct but the follow up kind of ruined it.

e

Joined
09 Dec 05
Moves
955
Clock
08 Jul 09
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Garnoth
12. Pd5 is mate on the spot, your queens sac was correct but the follow up kind of ruined it.
n-d5 and yes that is correct(knight is pinned).

U
Named 'Nobody'

At the Siren's arms

Joined
26 Feb 08
Moves
11215
Clock
08 Jul 09
2 edits
Vote Up
Vote Down

Well, allow me to contribute in it a little bit further. The lads are correct. 12.Nd5#. The pattern is known as Legall's mate and it is one of the most ancient traps in theory. 9...Ne5 was butter on your bread because if the Knight remained in c6 the trap just doesn't work. Assuming that you play Ne5 to lure your opponent to capture your queen he just plays Nxe5 and he is up a piece. I am leaving you to check the millions of positions that can be produced as a reference to the Legall's patterns.🙂

G

Joined
16 Nov 06
Moves
9787
Clock
08 Jul 09
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by erikido
n-d5 and yes that is correct(knight is pinned).
Haha, yeah, I meant Nd5, P is dutch notation (Paard=knight) for knight.

U

Joined
10 May 09
Moves
13341
Clock
08 Jul 09
Vote Up
Vote Down

Did you think that all the way through?? I only wish I could see that far ahead. I've never sac'd my queen (intentionally!) unless it was part of a short mating web. But that's not really a sac.

Did you see a mating web or was there a major tactical advantage that you saw?

FL

Joined
21 Feb 06
Moves
6830
Clock
08 Jul 09
1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

I don't know - if he'd played 12.Nd5# it would have been Yet Another Legal's Mate and not particularly interesting. What actually happened was much more fun. I applaud White for spurning the easy win.

PureRWandB
CCC Club Leader

Denver, CO

Joined
23 Feb 03
Moves
57012
Clock
08 Jul 09
1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Correct, it's not a sac, more like bait, or forbidden fruit, if you will.

If black gets greedy and takes Queen, this is the result (in this particular position on move 12)
This doesn't happen very often in CC games, but I would suspect it's more common with blitz games... maybe/maybe not... idk.
btw, did you catch black's nickname ?

Never the less... great setup and game Chesskid001

E

Joined
28 Mar 07
Moves
5104
Clock
09 Jul 09
Vote Up
Vote Down

sac is for cowards.

real man goes for the draw.

c

USA

Joined
22 Dec 05
Moves
13780
Clock
09 Jul 09
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Fat Lady
I don't know - if he'd played 12.Nd5# it would have been Yet Another Legal's Mate and not particularly interesting. What actually happened was much more fun. I applaud White for spurning the easy win.
Thanks. I probably should've clarified the original post when I questioned the soundness- I was referring to the Bxf6+ move, which obviously rules out Nd5 mate. Of course in an OTB game I would play 12.Nd5#, but this is internet blitz, so why not make it a little more interesting?

c

USA

Joined
22 Dec 05
Moves
13780
Clock
12 Jul 09
Vote Up
Vote Down

Just thought I'd post another game of mine- this was 2 minute blitz, and involved an interesting piece sacrifice, although my opponent defended very passively at the end

[Event "uChess rated"]
[Site "www.uchess.com"]
[Date "2009.7.12"]
[Round "?"]
[White "chesskid001"]
[Black "capa42"]
[Result "1-0"]

k

Joined
08 Nov 08
Moves
4588
Clock
12 Jul 09
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Ulysses72
Well, allow me to contribute in it a little bit further. The lads are correct. 12.Nd5#. The pattern is known as Legall's mate and it is one of the most ancient traps in theory. 9...Ne5 was butter on your bread because if the Knight remained in c6 the trap just doesn't work. Assuming that you play Ne5 to lure your opponent to capture your queen he just pla ...[text shortened]... eck the millions of positions that can be produced as a reference to the Legall's patterns.🙂
As the mate was delivered by a rook supported by a knight it's actually called an Arabian mate.

The Legall's mate combines kn+kn+b, Blackburnes b+b+kn etc.
The last PGN, mate is given by a lone queen supported by a pawn (Gueridon's mate)

c

USA

Joined
22 Dec 05
Moves
13780
Clock
24 Jul 09
1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

To reinvigorate the thread, here is a three minute game I just played featuring an (unsound) sacrifice of a piece. Instead of 13...Bb4, 13... f5 would give black a winning advantage. After 17.Rh4+, Black should play Qxh4, when white is winning, but still has some work to do. Instead, 17.g7 (or gxf7) wins on the spot.

Hopefully we can see some games of others which involved nice sacrifices

[Event "uChess rated"]
[Site "www.uchess.com"]
[Date "2009.7.23"]
[Round "?"]
[White "chesskid001"]
[Black "blissland"]
[Result "1-0"]

G

Joined
29 Jun 06
Moves
41148
Clock
24 Jul 09
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by chesskid001
[b]To reinvigorate the thread, here is a three minute game I just played featuring an (unsound) sacrifice of a piece. Instead of 13...Bb4, 13... f5 would give black a winning advantage. After 17.Rh4+, Black should play Qxh4, when white is winning, but still has some work to do. Instead, 17.g7 (or gxf7) wins on the spot.

Hopefully we can see some games of ...[text shortened]... White "chesskid001"]
[Black "blissland"]
[Result "1-0"]

Really fun game to watch!

G

Joined
29 Jun 06
Moves
41148
Clock
24 Jul 09
1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

[White "Guych"]
[Black "beinarr"]
[Result "1-0"]
[WhiteElo "1123"]
[BlackElo "1265"]
[ECO "B23"]
[TimeControl "300"]

5 min game on FICS.

Edit: Forgot that this thread is for Queen sacs...

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.