Originally posted by Jasen777Yes. If you benefit from your opponent's explanations of the failure of his understanding of the strategic principles in the position, you have violated a sacred agreement with Caissa.
Does it count as receiving outside assistance if your opponent is messaging you explanations for his moves during the game?
Originally posted by Jasen777No, it does not.
Does it count as receiving outside assistance if your opponent is messaging you explanations for his moves during the game?
From TOS: "3(b) - While a game is in progress you may not refer to chess engines, chess
computers or be assisted by a third party."
Only third party assistance is against the rules. Your opponent is not a third party. A third
party is something or someone from outside the game.
It's very common for opponents to chat back and forth about a game - that's part of the reason
for the in-game messaging - to discuss the in-progress game. Not all games are competitive.
Many are played with players trying to learn and asking questions like "why did you move there?"
with answers like "because if you don't defend X with Y, then I'll be able to my move A to B
and capture your X."
Originally posted by Jasen777My longtime friend and former college roommate Bralen and I are playing such a game on the site, and I agreed beforehand to explain what I was thinking each move when I sent it. The game is still in progress, and I think it is helping both of us, as the act of writing down what I am thinking gives me a new perspective as well.
Does it count as receiving outside assistance if your opponent is messaging you explanations for his moves during the game?
I think the trick is that we are both exploring the game, and we are more focused on the process of the game than the result.
Paul