16 Mar 09
4 edits
Originally posted by greenpawn34That's close to a mirror image of Game 5836462
My guess is the lad means this game which finished today.
[pgn]
[Event "Challenge"]
[Site "http://www.redhotpawn.com"]
[Date "2009.02.06"]
[EndDate "2009.03.16"]
[Round "?"]
[White "Chandradi"]
[Black "Glen Fiddich"]
[WhiteRating "852"]
[BlackRating "1125"]
[WhiteELO "852"]
[BlackELO "1125"]
[Result "1-0"]
[GameId "5974347"]
1. e4 e5 2 ...[text shortened]... . d4 g5 9. h4 Bf8b4 10. c3 d6 11. hxg5 Kh6g7 12. Qf5f7[/pgn]
Bravo!
PS: <ahem> I now present another shameless plug for my latest youtube analysis. This time I did a game that I lost.
18 Mar 09
I had someone play Damiano against me last year. I didn't know what it was called until afterward, but I guarantee I'll not forget it.
Game 5020215
18 Mar 09
Originally posted by Mad RookThe thing we must remeber is that Damiano said;
Damiano's defense. 😞
Do Not play 2...f6
He was the first to mention it's drawback so his name is attached to it.
Bit of a shame really.
Fischer met it once in a simul and drew - he thought he was playing a
patzer not realising that Black was a reasonable player so played a
handful of weak moves.
18 Mar 09
Originally posted by greenpawn34Yeah, history definitely gave him the shaft. Maybe we should start calling it Damiano's Non Defense.
The thing we must remeber is that Damiano said;
[b]Do Not play 2...f6
He was the first to mention it's drawback so his name is attached to it.
Bit of a shame really.
Fischer met it once in a simul and drew - he thought he was playing a
patzer not realising that Black was a reasonable player so played a
handful of weak moves.[/b]