Go back
Refuting an opening trap

Refuting an opening trap

Only Chess

2 edits

Refuting the Queen's Fianchetto Nimzowitsch opening trap.

  • 8
  • a
  • 7
  • b
  • 6
  • c
  • 5
  • d
  • 4
  • e
  • 3
  • f
  • 2
  • g
  • 1
  • h
1.e4Nc6
2.d4d5
3.e5f6
4.Bd3Nxd4
5.Qh5g6
6.Bxg6hxg6
7.Qxh8Nxc2
8.Kd1Qd7
9.Kxc2Qg4
10.Qxg8Bf5
11.Kd2O-O-O
12.Qh7Qg5
13.Kd1Qxg2
14.Ne2Qxh1
15.Kd2Qf1
16.Qh4d4
17.Qf4Bh6
18.Qxh6d3
19.Ng3Qxf2
20.Kc3Qc2
21.Kb4Rd4
22.Ka5Qc5

This is my attempt to refute an opening position which is listed in all my books as a loosing position but which I think is the opposite. The position is one which I am sure many players have got themselves into, especially in their early chess life. Most, like me, learn that it is to be avoided, and we then play so that we don't get into the position. In this annotation I want to challenge that assumption and examine a possible line of play that turns the whole thing on it's head - defining the position, not as a loosing one, but as a winning one.

0

      1 edit
      Vote Up
      Vote Down

      7. Qxg6+ Kd7
      8- Qg4+ and capture Knight on d4 must be better at first sight.

      edit -- no, I overlooked 8...Ne6
      Anyway, it's sharp position after ...Nxd4 but nothing was decided yet. Good stuff (or staff?!) for blitz games.

      Vote Up
      Vote Down

      Yes I agree.
      I came across it in an old GM Nigel Davis chess lesson. He didn't actually develop the position, but he noted that although the books all said White has the advantage after 7. Qxh8 he didn't agree, and thought black could win from that position.
      I played around with it and then tried it in a 40 minute game. At that time I was around 1900 and my opponent was a 2100 player. I won :-)

      Vote Up
      Vote Down

      7.Qh8: was a mistake, as the Queen is out of play for too long. 7.Qg6:+ K any, 8.Qd3 looks better


      Originally posted by sundown316
      7.Qh8: was a mistake, as the Queen is out of play for too long. 7.Qg6:+ K any, 8.Qd3 looks better
      That's an admission by White that he simply lost a piece.

      Vote Up
      Vote Down

      Maybe white was greedy in taking the knight. Perhaps retracting the queen would have been a wiser move for white?

      Vote Up
      Vote Down

      2 edits
      Vote Up
      Vote Down

      Originally posted by Eladar
      Maybe white was greedy in taking the knight. Perhaps retracting the queen would have been a wiser move for white?
      Actually looked at the board this time, no real way to retract the queen so I guess the moral to the problem here is king safety before attack.

      Looking again, perhaps 10.Nf3 works....

      I'm just rambling lol

      Vote Up
      Vote Down

      I post like I play. That 10.Nf3 doesn't work either!

      Vote Up
      Vote Down

      Originally posted by Eladar
      Actually looked at the board this time, no real way to retract the queen so I guess the moral to the problem here is king safety before attack.

      Looking again, perhaps 10.Nf3 works....

      I'm just rambling lol
      White could play Qh3 with the idea that after a black Q check he can block with his Q rather than let her get eaten by Bc8. Trouble is ...Bf5+ Kd2 Bh6 hurts. (I took the lazy route and had the comp show me this stuff.)

      Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.