Originally posted by joesheppe
This is pretty sad to hear from you, Paul. You were rated 1800 something this past January on the basis of beating weaker opponents, and now you're saying that you should be rated 2300, were it not for your recent sickness?
Well, maybe. We'll see, but I'm not going to bet the house on that.
I think you are confused between me and the original poster, sir. And I do not know what why you have an issue with me, or who I have played. I never turn down challenges, and I get more challenges from lower-rated players, not to mention that most of my tournament opponents happen to be lower-rated than me.
I did add an apology in my profile because I had games going on where my rating was higher when they started but lower by the time they ended, so some of my opponents did not get "full credit" if they won against me.
I CERTAINLY never made any statement about ever being 2300, nor do I see myself getting to 2300 any time in the near future!
Paul
EDIT: And if having a high rating is important to anyone, I recommend NOT playing lower-rated players. If I play someone 400 points below me, I get 1 point if I win, but I lose 32 points or so if I lose. Winning 32 games and losing one just to break even is not what I call a successful formula for increasing one's rating- especially as some of our lower-rated friends here are underrated, and won't be that way for long!