Originally posted by RavelloThis book is subject to copyright.
This is the typically stupid answer I was expecting.
Robbing is a thing,downloading something on the net is a completely different issue.
Ha! I just downloaded "Art of attack in chess" by V.Vukovic,you can continue babbling as you want!😛
The word theft is accurate. It is not "too much of big words". Just one more attempt by yourself to ease your conscience.
The reason we are seeing such a reaction from you is that you know it is true.
Originally posted by WajomaHihihihihi,I downloaded a chess ebook,officiers come here and take me to prison!
This book is subject to copyright.
The word theft is accurate. It is not "too much of big words". Just one more attempt by yourself to ease your conscience.
The reason we are seeing such a reaction from you is that you know it is true.
Pajama,lighten up and get a life dude,thieves are a completely different thing.
Oh and I have not a conscience😉
Chess Books = Waste of money
Get one opening book, find 3 openings for white you like, and one against e4 and d4, use english symmetrical against c4 dutch works against g4. Play those openings against masters ect. Analyze them to the bone. And come up with some variations you like. Buy ChessBase 9.0 and analyze every single variation for the 7 openings (3 for white, one against e4, one against d4, english symmetrical, and Dutch). If you do that, you will easily become master strength.
Originally posted by LordOfTheChessboardA thief should not talk about ripoffs.
You don't seem to understand what I am saying...
90% of these chess books are writen only for the money. Take reassess your chess, its a complete ripoff from nimzowits my system there's not tiny bit of new information in it. Even YOU could have written it. Why pay the autor for ripping off Nimzowits and not even mentioning it.
There's not one great piece of art that was not made because it was not subsidised.
Originally posted by LordOfTheChessboardAhhh... Micheal Moore... that explains your brainwashing.
If people do not create to express themselves but create for the money then how to you explain michael moore encouraging us to download his stuff from the web???
How do you explain all those sites where people will give you something only if you give them money?
Originally posted by RavelloYes, there certainly is a distinction. It's safer to steal on the net than it is to walk into a store and steal. Thieves can't afford to be brave people.
This is the typically stupid answer I was expecting.
Robbing is a thing,downloading something on the net is a completely different issue.
Ha! I just downloaded "Art of attack in chess" by V.Vukovic,you can continue babbling as you want!😛
Originally posted by RavelloIf somebody give you something for free then it's not theft.
Come on and stop such idiotic zealotism.
Twenty years ago we all recorded our favorite bands on old tapes.
Ten years ago we all recorded some movie from Tv with a vcr.
Nowadays there's internet where you can download free stuff.
Tell me,genius on a high horse : If downloading is considered theft,why the net is full of sites where you can downloa ...[text shortened]... why "theft" is allowed on those sites?
again :you high-horse-guys are plain ridiculous.
If somebody charges you money for something, and you take it without paying, it's theft.