Go back
Silly chess problem

Silly chess problem

Only Chess

Clock
Vote Up
Vote Down

http://i19.photobucket.com/albums/b177/gallicrow/Chess_Problem_1.jpg

White to move and mate in three.

Those of you who have read the "Game 2191106" thread will obviously know the trick.

As far as I know this problem was composed by Tim Krabbé, who, incidentally, runs possibly the best chess site on the internet: http://www.chesscafe.com/

Clock
Vote Up
Vote Down

I dont get it. there is no mate in three...

Clock
2 edits
Vote Up
Vote Down

This should be easier to read:


Whoops, I think I ballsed up the position. Try this one (Added Black pawn to h3).

Clock
1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Ok. Not much interest here, so I'll give the solution:

Key: 1. e7

A) 1. ... g5
2. e8=R+
A1) 2. ... Kf3
3. o-o mate
A2) 2. ... Kd3
3. o-o-o mate

B) 1. ... Kf3
2. e8=R
B1) 2. ... g5
3. o-o mate
B2) 2. ... Kg2
3. o-o-o-o mate

C) 1. ... Kd3
2. e8=R
C1) 2. ... g5
3. o-o-o mate
C2 2. ... Kc2
3. o-o-o-o mate

Clock
Vote Up
Vote Down

And you didnt bother to mention this puzzle involves an illegal move? bravo...

Clock
Vote Up
Vote Down

It wasn't illegal when the puzzle was composed.

Clock
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Fat Lady
This should be easier to read:
[fen]8/8/4P1p1/3p4/2pP2p1/1pP1k1Pp/1P5P/R3K2R w KQ 0 1[/fen]

Whoops, I think I ballsed up the position. Try this one (Added Black pawn to h3).
Is this from the game? Or is this just a puzzle using the old rule?

Clock
Vote Up
Vote Down

It's a puzzle, not from a real game.

Clock
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Red Night
Is this from the game? Or is this just a puzzle using the old rule?
The "old rule" was never a rule, only a flaw in the rule book.
Has been used only once, and then not without heavy discussion.
The rule was rewritten when the fault was recognized.

Clock
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by FabianFnas
The "old rule" was never a rule, only a flaw in the rule book.
Has been used only once, and then not without heavy discussion.
The rule was rewritten when the fault was recognized.
"old rule" ??

Clock
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by leisurelysloth
"old rule" ??
Apparently in 1903 or 1904, in a Master's game, one of the players castled using a promoted pawn turned into a rook on e8 and a king on e1.

The Rook ended up on e2 and the King on e3.

Because the Rook on e8 and the King on e1 had never moved they were able to castle under the rules as written at the time. This was an unintended consequence of a poorly written rule and the rule was quickly re-written.

I would love to see the game in question, as it is hard to imagine the situation where it would make sense.

Clock
Vote Up
Vote Down

Thanks for clearing that up.

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.