Originally posted by hardyrulesWhat's the difference between algebraic and coordinate?
Hi,
Will someone please unequivically indicate what is the standard as far as notation for games goes. It seems there are three types, namely algebraic, descriptive and coordinate.
I have borrowed Staunton's Handbook (which was apparently seminal 100 years ago), but his notation seems dated now - I think he uses descriptive, eg. P-K4 etc.
What ...[text shortened]... a destination square, but no indiaction of which piece moves!?
Thanks in advance...
Russ.
1 edit
Originally posted by AThousandYoungAlgebraic has letters along the files and numbers on the ranks - so the bottom left hand square from White's point of view is a1, top right is h8.
What's the difference between algebraic and coordinate?
In co-ordinate notation, both are numbers - so the bottom left is 11 and the top right is 88.
So, moving a pawn from e2 to e4 is just e4 in algebraic (e2-e4 in full algebraic), but 5254 in co-ordinate. (P-K4 in descriptive).
Co-ordinate notation was only ever used in correspondence chess, I guess because not every player was familiar with the sequence of letters a-h.
Originally posted by buddy2In fact, when I teach chess to third graders, the chess lessons build on their math lessons where they learn about coordinates and grids. The same part of the brain that processes algebra is stimulated when using algebraic notation.
Why call it "algabraic"? It has nothing to do with algebra. It should be called "alpha-numeric."
"Alpha-numeric" is an awkward term that does not please the ear. The term algebraic is logical and describes well the layout of the board along ranks and files.