@daodejing saidThis was pretty interesting.
What does Magnus say to this analysis?! :-)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Cf1FZvHwX1A&t=684s
@daodejing saidIn fact it supports the old saying: you don't win at chess you avoid losing...
What does Magnus say to this analysis?! :-)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Cf1FZvHwX1A&t=684s
- Joined
- 04 Sep 22
- Moves
- 3157
Also for Kasparov? - with whom I had the pleasure of coming into personal contacts a long time ago, obviously shares my opinion:
Talking about the happenings related to the Carlsen – Niemann case and the game in which Niemann defeated Carlsen at the Sinquefield Cup, Kasparov said: “I was in Saint Louis. I spoke to people who were involved directly in this case. I don’t see an evidence that could be convincing... I understand his frustration, but leaving the tournament is unacceptable. Even if he had proof, but there was no proof, there is zero evidence (of cheating) in that specific game. It was really bad for chess. It was bad for Saint Louis. This was one of the most important tournaments, if not the most important tournament, in the world of chess. And I think that his behavior was unacceptable“.
https://www.chessdom.com/garry-kasparov-carlsens-behavior-was-unacceptable/
- Joined
- 10 Jan 08
- Moves
- 20165
@daodejing saidLooks like they're giving you the thumbs, why so?
@Daodejing
Aha, thumbs down for Kasparov?! :-) For political reasons?