pleeeaaase only talk about chess if you know what youre talking about, idk much about chess but i only talk about what i do know.
do not use notation when you get it wrong, and if you dont know it that well check before you talk about it, dont say youre going to pawn storm a sicilian and not open up with any piece, dont say the sicilian is easy to learn cuz its not, those are some stupid posts i have seen while being here.
Originally posted by EcstremeVenomif we all knew where we are wrong, we'd all be better players as well. but we don't, and that's why we are where we are. there's no free lunch.
youre both missing the point, it doesnt bother you that people say dumb things about chess that is totally wrong? its annoying to me
I guess you're one of those person who would have tried to convince Dick Fosbury that he was wrong in '68, because he wasn't even able to apply the century old technique of the straddle - I mean what a LOSER!
Well my friend, there are the keepers of the flame, and then the ones who explore different ways, just because the traditional way doesnt work for them.
I guess we need both, but it's still funny to hear those arrogant-I know better than you-this move wasnt an intersting attempt in a different direction, it was a BLUNDER because I said so-you can't go against century of theory-kind of people.
So yeah I wont discard any move just because it's not in the book.
So yeah, keep talking people, trash your mad ideas here, lets prove that its a good idea to attack with the king or that you don't really need a Queen, share your creativity, that's the only way to remove some dust from the chessboard. That's why Fisher came with his random stuff I suppose, somebody has to do the job, while the bookeepers keep telling us how wrong we all are.
When I see your truth, I am happy to be wrong 😀