1 edit
Originally posted by Sicilian SmaugEnglish! This explains it totally! You're still mad we dumped the tea off the side of the ship! HAHA!!! Sorry, I didn't care to do much research on your background, nationality, and ethnicity. I guess if I cared about you more, I would have. And, I just don't understand how an Englishman can be so imbecilic. I love the English. I'm an Adams through and through. But, I guess sometimes, even good countries have bad apples. LOL!
For f's sake! What is wrong with you you retard?😠I wasnt having any sort of go at her, but as for you..
I move instantly on here, and he uses numerous resources and calls his 1600 rating on RHP a true USCF rating! HAHA!!!... What 'numerous resources would these be? Also USCF is the US Chess Federation and I am English so of course i wouldnt cl ...[text shortened]... ssing about ratings and your latest performance against your chess computer, No one gives a ####
1 edit
Originally posted by Sicilian SmaugWell, I challenge you then! But, you're too scared to play a 10 game match against me on RHP using no resources! I'll take my time with you and have fun smashing you. And, those performance ratings you speak of on those graphs? They mean nothing! I'll play you for real, and CRUSH YOU and let everyone watch!
For f's sake! What is wrong with you you retard?😠I wasnt having any sort of go at her, but as for you..
I move instantly on here, and he uses numerous resources and calls his 1600 rating on RHP a true USCF rating! HAHA!!!... What 'numerous resources would these be? Also USCF is the US Chess Federation and I am English so of course i wouldnt cl ...[text shortened]... ssing about ratings and your latest performance against your chess computer, No one gives a ####
Originally posted by powershakeryou keep talking big, but have nothing to show for it. beating somebody once doesn't mean a thing. beating your computer means even less. we can all see your graph.
And, I myself have lost to idiots in my time, like the time I lost to Smaug (who is far weaker than I am)
He says he's gained 200 points of strength in two months. Humanly impossible. haha!
and as for what is 'humanly impossible', smaug has the graph to prove it.
Originally posted by wormwoodThat graph doesn't mean crud when you're playing blitz chess in a correspondence setting. HAHA!!! I wish I had some of you patzers across a real OTB situation! I'd make you cry! HAHA
you keep talking big, but have nothing to show for it. beating somebody once doesn't mean a thing. beating your computer means even less. we can all see your graph.
and as for what is 'humanly impossible', smaug has the graph to prove it.
1 edit
Originally posted by wormwoodCorrespondence graph on RHP you mean, wormwood? LOL! Correspondence where I use nothing and people use their resources? I'm not putting people down for playing correspondence chess and taking advantage of literature and databases. That's of course the rules. But, I am saying that there are a lot of 1800 correspondence players who in the end really are 1400, even 1500 players. lol
you keep talking big, but have nothing to show for it. beating somebody once doesn't mean a thing. beating your computer means even less. we can all see your graph.
and as for what is 'humanly impossible', smaug has the graph to prove it.
p.s. CHECK IT! I knew this chick with a 2,000,000 game database. She just plugged the position in, and boom! The computer didn't help with the moves. But, that's legal in correspondence chess. Nothing wrong with researching a position, and if you play the same lines, you begin to collect games with the best moves in response to other moves. I've seen it myself. It's a fact.
Originally posted by powershakerI don't use 'resources' or databases, and I'm still 200pts higher than you. and I gladly confess being patzer and a novice, but what does that make you?
Correspondence graph on RHP you mean, wormwood? LOL! Correspondence where I use nothing and people use their resources? I'm not putting people down for playing correspondence chess and taking advantage of literature and databases. That's of course the rules. But, I am saying that there are a lot of 1800 correspondence players who in the end really are 1400, even 1500 players. lol
making crappy moves fast makes you just bad at chess, not strong. this should be self-evident.