Go back
Suscribers

Suscribers

Only Chess

t

Joined
02 Aug 07
Moves
1764
Clock
21 Jun 08
6 edits
Vote Up
Vote Down

Does anybody else here find that most subscribers are easy wins? I think its because most of them have so many games in progress. Most of the ones I have played against have 35 games in progress but I have played a 70 and a 191. With that many games how do you keep your blunder checking up to par? I find that when I have just one game in progress I play very well in it because I'm able to concentrate my efforts. What do you all think?

Here is a game against an anonymous subscriber that I played to show my point. He has 70 games in progress.

N

The sky

Joined
05 Apr 05
Moves
10385
Clock
21 Jun 08
Vote Up
Vote Down

Most players rated almost 200 points below you are easy wins. Maybe some of the players would have higher ratings if they'd limit their game number, but there are also people who seem to deal very well with lots of games, and others who play few games, but still suck. Try playing User 96179, who currently has 432 games in progress...

GF
soccer player

USA

Joined
18 Aug 07
Moves
13304
Clock
21 Jun 08
Vote Up
Vote Down

I play about 16 games

N

Joined
29 Jul 06
Moves
1331
Clock
21 Jun 08
Vote Up
Vote Down

I agree subscribers are easy wins

N

Joined
29 Jul 06
Moves
1331
Clock
21 Jun 08
Vote Up
Vote Down

I think its because they're so fat on time outs, and they dont have time for more than 2-5 minutes per move

Very Rusty
Treat Everyone Equal

Halifax, Nova Scotia

Joined
04 Oct 06
Moves
640063
Clock
21 Jun 08
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by NorrisB
I agree subscribers are easy wins
LOL....You have won 8 and lost 5, do you think you have played enough games to make that assessment?

Very Rusty
Treat Everyone Equal

Halifax, Nova Scotia

Joined
04 Oct 06
Moves
640063
Clock
21 Jun 08
1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by timmydoza
[b]Does anybody else here find that most subscribers are easy wins? I think its because most of them have so many games in progress. Most of the ones I have played against have 35 games in progress but I have played a 70 and a 191. With that many games how do you keep your blunder checking up to par? I find that when I have just one game in progress I pla a game against an anonymous subscriber that I played to show my point. He has 70 games in progress.
It looks by your graph that your rating is still on the climb yet. There are some high rated players on here who can handle hundreds of games, and have a higher rating than you have yet to achieve.

Nordlys has pointed out one who is a tough player and consistent, I know because he has kicked my butt more than enough times. 🙂

N

The sky

Joined
05 Apr 05
Moves
10385
Clock
21 Jun 08
Vote Up
Vote Down

Or how about User 51824 (141 games in progress)? Good luck with that! 😵

Very Rusty
Treat Everyone Equal

Halifax, Nova Scotia

Joined
04 Oct 06
Moves
640063
Clock
21 Jun 08
1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Nordlys
Or how about User 51824 (141 games in progress)? Good luck with that! 😵
LOL...Yea, it is kind'a like how is he going to kick my butt this time...I even slow down not to play blitz against him especially!! 😉

You would be one of the few players between 1600-1800 that I haven't played yet!

c
Grammar Nazi

Auschwitz

Joined
03 Apr 06
Moves
44348
Clock
21 Jun 08
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by NorrisB
I agree subscribers are easy wins
LOL.
You have only played two games against subscribers that did not end in timeout very early. Here they are:

Game 4957166
Game 4895657

These games, especially the first one, clearly show that subscirbers are no match for you.😉

Mctayto
Highlander

Planet Earth

Joined
10 Dec 04
Moves
1044704
Clock
21 Jun 08
Vote Up
Vote Down

Between them they only have one game in progress, I trust the pair of them are not collaberating on the moves for that game 😀

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.