08 Dec 05
Originally posted by bassobowmann probably just had irony-overload that day. or the wording of your question had a slight possibility of being humorously misinterpreted. the bowmann works in mysterious ways.
Awhile ago I posed the question: Are chess problems the best way to work on one's tactical skills? I got one reply, which was, "Absolutely not." Very surprising. Well, then, how is one to work on one's tactical game? Thanks.
"wax on, wax off, daniel-san."
08 Dec 05
Originally posted by bassoI think that reply was from Bowmann so there is NO need to pay any mind to it.
Awhile ago I posed the question: Are chess problems the best way to work on one's tactical skills? I got one reply, which was, "Absolutely not." Very surprising. Well, then, how is one to work on one's tactical game? Thanks.
Working problems is a great way.
08 Dec 05
Originally posted by bassoPerhaps Bowmann was directing attention to your use of "best," but it is hard to be certain.
Awhile ago I posed the question: Are chess problems the best way to work on one's tactical skills? I got one reply, which was, "Absolutely not." Very surprising. Well, then, how is one to work on one's tactical game? Thanks.
Most strong players work tactical problems, so you should too. But also have a looks at http://www.jeremysilman.com/chess_instruction/build_base_chess_und.html