Originally posted by dirtysniperLol. I have a strict no playing policy on RHP whenever there is beer involved.
I believe Beer is holding me back.
Originally posted by heinzkat
What are you doing worse than your 200+ points higher rated opponents?
'worse' is hardly the word...to rarely use databases, perhaps I'm just less 'reliant' and that can be to the detriment of my game. To have a greater willingness to play toward the statistical aspects of a game, why in a fianchetto indian 4. e4 has a 2% better chance than g3 etc etc ...[text shortened]... nfident 'some aspects' of what I say may well be understood...as for the rest, who knows
Originally posted by wormwoodLook, that's more like it. So if you would get rid of those aspects, would you be 200 points stronger?
weak attacking technique
tendency to ignore getting weaknesses in favour of attacking chances
tendency to choose complications over solidity
Originally posted by heinzkatif I could get rid of them, I'd be 400 points higher. but I'd settle for getting mediocre, and reaching some kind of more or less complete coverage over said areas. that should do the 200+ difference I think.
Look, that's more like it. So if you would get rid of those aspects, would you be 200 points stronger?