Go back
The Danger of Underestimating...

The Danger of Underestimating...

Only Chess

jcmessy

Joined
26 Aug 11
Moves
10242
Clock
17 Nov 12
Vote Up
Vote Down

Instead of 18..Rc8;
Can Black save himself if 18..Ne5??


Game 9603682

kNIGHTHEAD
aka DEFIANT

Joined
29 Nov 06
Moves
91919
Clock
21 Nov 12
Vote Up
Vote Down

Never underestimate the power of underestimation!

jcmessy

Joined
26 Aug 11
Moves
10242
Clock
22 Nov 12
Vote Up
Vote Down

🙂

s
Fast and Curious

slatington, pa, usa

Joined
28 Dec 04
Moves
53321
Clock
22 Nov 12
2 edits
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by jcmessy
🙂
What about R-g8 instead, the idea being, seeing the knight sac threat, you give your king a hidey hole and run instead of taking the knight.


Looking at it again, that loses at least the exchange so I guess not.

So lets modify that idea with R-h8 which now protects the h6 square against the coming queen check.

jcmessy

Joined
26 Aug 11
Moves
10242
Clock
22 Nov 12
2 edits
Vote Up
Vote Down

The Danger of Underestimating...
Analysis...Analysis...Analysis... 🙂


Game 9603682

The alternative 18..Rh8 gives white two good continuation:
[A]. The immediate 19. Nxc4 which is good enough for an endgame duel.
[B]. or the more promising
19. Nc6! Bxc6 (forced);
20. dxc6 Nb6 ( The alternative 20..Ne5; is simply meet by 21. f4 Ng4; 22. Nxc4!)
21. Nd5 Na8 (where else?; not 21..Nxd5? because the pawn recapture creates a connected passed pawn.)
22. Qd4! with the immediate threat of 23. Nxf6 isolating d6-pawn, (creating another weakness.)
or just the simple play 23. Qxc4. 🙂 good enough?

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.