Go back
the sicilian

the sicilian

Only Chess

2 edits
Vote Up
Vote Down

whatever!!!!
and the C & F files are not flank/wing files???

when players talk about the "centre" they're talking about all the coloured sqaures in that diagram, IF they are more specific they will say "basic centre" or "broader centre" but in general the term "centre" is used.. and the centre is the 4 middle squares and 12 surrounding ie both the basic & broader centre = Centre.. ? ok

1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

C and F are Flank. Flanks can influence the center since they obviously border it.
Anyway, that's the way they used to call it (Basic center = center). Maybe terminology has changed.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Regicidal
C and F are Flank. Flanks can influence the center since they obviously border it.
for the 2nd time the A, B G & H files are the flanks

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by !~TONY~!
The original poster analyzed the moves quite wrong. Notice that cxd4 isn't just a waste. It trades a flank pawn for a center pawn. Qc7 has the queen looking all the way down the c-file, while the pawns on e6, d6, and a6 stop white from moving anywhere on the 5th rank. It's tough to break down something like that. Sure, white is developed, but he has to work hard to exploit his development against blacks solid position.
cxd4 in terms of development is a useless pawn move, it wastes time, white responds with a developing move (namely Nd4). And sure Qc7 may be a good square for the queen but it's the second piece black has moved. I'm not saying this opening is bad I'm only saying that looking at it like this makes it seem that way.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by bobbob1056th
cxd4 in terms of development is a useless pawn move, it wastes time, white responds with a developing move (namely Nd4). And sure Qc7 may be a good square for the queen but it's the second piece black has moved. I'm not saying this opening is bad I'm only saying that looking at it like this makes it seem that way.
How is cxd4 a uselss pawn move?! It stops white dominating the centre. In addition, Nxd4 maybe a developing move, but it is also moving a piece a second time in the opening, which if were just going off rules and paying no attention to the actual position itself (which you seem to be doing) is also a bad idea, so we should recapture with the queen as that has not moved yet... but wait!!! moving the queen into the centre in the opening is also usually a big no-no 'gasp' whatever shall we do?

Now I've got that out of the way... the opening must be balanced between playing to general principles, and playing what is necessary.

Vote Up
Vote Down

You're right, the actual position is what matters, not the dogmatic rules. But I was saying that based on the dogmatic rules one might be lead to believe white has a large advantage...

Ok, you have a good point. I'll give you credit (maybe Qd4 isn't too good a move, but it certainly is playable and may keep an edge(I haven't analyzed the position carefully)) And besides the fact that Nd4 moves a piece twice his knight isn't too well-placed there, so yes, I'd say if we consider the position even after e4 c5 Ne2 d6 d4 then black would have an advantage after cd4 Nd4 (that makes sense right?)

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Regicidal
Just don't play the sicilian dragon. It sucks!
Works fine for me. Maybe you're doing it wrong.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by bobbob1056th
You're right, the actual position is what matters, not the dogmatic rules. But I was saying that based on the dogmatic rules one might be lead to believe white has a large advantage...

Ok, you have a good point. I'll give you credit (maybe Qd4 isn't too good a move, but it certainly is playable and may keep an edge(I haven't analyzed the positi ...[text shortened]... after e4 c5 Ne2 d6 d4 then black would have an advantage after cd4 Nd4 (that makes sense right?)
Dogmatically, Black does have an advantage after 1.e4 c5 2.Nf3 d6 3.d4 cd - as someone else said, he's swapped a useless flank pawn for a vital center pawn, and has a plan of developing a minority attack on teh Qside. All White has in compensation is an initiative and a bit of space. Larsen claimed (tongue somewhat in cheek) that 3.d4 was incorrect for this reason.

In reality, the Sicilian would probably be =+ if White hadn't worked out how to play 'undogmatically' with various early g4 systems (see for instance Watson's Secrets of Modern Chess Strategy).

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by XanthosNZ
Works fine for me. Maybe you're doing it wrong.
Yea I like it too are you sure you got the rigth move order?

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Regicidal
Just don't play the sicilian dragon. It sucks!
Yeah I tried playing it but it sucked for me because I'm a noob and I can't see the point of attacking on the queenside when white is just going to shove something up your king.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Dfthd
Yeah I tried playing it but it sucked for me because I'm a noob and I can't see the point of attacking on the queenside when white is just going to shove something up your king.
Ouch!

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by welsharnie
Personally I think the main reason it is seen often on this site is that it is one of blacks most reliable defences to e4, and that it is commonly played in over the board chess too. It also contains many varietys of position in its plethora of lines.
Yes. It is the most commonly played move by quite a bit. It is also the best scoring of black's common moves as well.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Dfthd
Yeah I tried playing it but it sucked for me because I'm a noob and I can't see the point of attacking on the queenside when white is just going to shove something up your king.
That sounds kinda sexy in a dirty way.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by AThousandYoung
That sounds kinda sexy in a dirty way.
You'd have to be female otherwise it'd just be kinda gay=P

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Dfthd
You'd have to be female otherwise it'd just be kinda gay=P
It's just kinda gay 🙂