Please turn on javascript in your browser to play chess.
Only Chess Forum
Edmonton, Alberta
Joined 25 Nov '04 Moves 2101 Originally posted by cmsMaster
1/14 is way too quick - I'll simply lose on timeout. And you dare question why I play only 2-3 games at once?
Come on take them. I deleted my game vs a friend just cause of you.
Riga
Joined 05 Jan '05 Moves 24932 Originally posted by RahimK
Look at all the games if you want. They are all there.
Go ahead and then you tell me. Have been loked. And I can say that I wont be surprised if cms wont lose you.
Edmonton, Alberta
Joined 25 Nov '04 Moves 2101 Originally posted by Korch
Have been loked. And I can say that I wont be surprised if cms wont lose you. And yet you still tell me that I should play him to prove my point.
I am better then him. I don't need to prove it. My games and ratings speak for themselves.
Joined 02 Feb '06 Moves 8557 Originally posted by RahimK
And yet you still tell me that I should play him to prove my point.
I am better then him. I don't need to prove it. My games and ratings speak for themselves. I think Korch is saying he won't be surprised if I beat you, though I'm not 100% sure with how he worded it - he may have just forgot the word 'to'.
Edmonton, Alberta
Joined 25 Nov '04 Moves 2101 Originally posted by cmsMaster
I think Korch is saying he won't be surprised if I beat you, though I'm not 100% sure with how he worded it - he may have just forgot the word 'to'. And I can say that I wont be surprised if cms wont lose you.
You are right, he meant to write "to" before you.
won't lose to you.
Joined 02 Feb '06 Moves 8557 Originally posted by RahimK
And I can say that I wont be surprised if cms wont lose you.
You are right, he meant to write "to" before you.
won't lose to you. ...
Riga
Joined 05 Jan '05 Moves 24932 I did mean "will not lose you". Excuse for my english.
I wanted to say that these games can finish with all 3 possible results and that RahimK advantage is not so obvious.
Edmonton, Alberta
Joined 25 Nov '04 Moves 2101 Originally posted by Korch
I did mean "will not lose you". Excuse for my english.
I wanted to say that these games can finish with all 3 possible results and that RahimK advantage is not so obvious. Confused.
Let's try this again. You looked at mine and his games and you are saying that:
CMS will not lose to me? Yes or no, will do fine.
Riga
Joined 05 Jan '05 Moves 24932 Originally posted by RahimK
Confused.
Let's try this again. You looked at mine and his games and you are saying that:
CMS will not lose to me? Yes or no, will do fine. Repeating - game between cms and Rahim can finish with 3 possible results.
3 possible results = 1)Rahim will win 2)cms will win 3) draw
Joined 02 Feb '06 Moves 8557 Originally posted by RahimK
Confused.
Let's try this again. You looked at mine and his games and you are saying that:
CMS will not lose to me? Yes or no, will do fine. "I wanted to say that these games can finish with all 3 possible results and that RahimK advantage is not so obvious."
Is pretty clear.
Edmonton, Alberta
Joined 25 Nov '04 Moves 2101 Originally posted by Korch
If someone is writing personally offensive texts on me, then I`would be agree to beat him in chess with pleasure. And after winning the game I would comment it in forum to show him as patzer 🙂 After winning the game I would comment on it in the forums to show my opponent is a patzer.
What great advice!
Riga
Joined 05 Jan '05 Moves 24932 Originally posted by RahimK
After winning the game I would comment on it in the forums to show my opponent is a patzer.
What great advice! I`m not sure will you be able to use it 😉
Edmonton, Alberta
Joined 25 Nov '04 Moves 2101 Originally posted by Korch
I`m not sure will you be able to use it 😉 This is no battle of wits between you and me. I never pick on an unarmed man.
Account suspended
Joined 14 Nov '06 Moves 17862 Originally posted by RahimK
This is no battle of wits between you and me. I never pick on an unarmed man. that is so old...
Riga
Joined 05 Jan '05 Moves 24932 Originally posted by RahimK
This is no battle of wits between you and me. I never pick on an unarmed man. Good excuse for coward like you.
Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More . I Agree