Originally posted by RahimKI think Korch is saying he won't be surprised if I beat you, though I'm not 100% sure with how he worded it - he may have just forgot the word 'to'.
And yet you still tell me that I should play him to prove my point.
I am better then him. I don't need to prove it. My games and ratings speak for themselves.
Originally posted by cmsMasterAnd I can say that I wont be surprised if cms wont lose you.
I think Korch is saying he won't be surprised if I beat you, though I'm not 100% sure with how he worded it - he may have just forgot the word 'to'.
You are right, he meant to write "to" before you.
won't lose to you.
Originally posted by KorchConfused.
I did mean "will not lose you". Excuse for my english.
I wanted to say that these games can finish with all 3 possible results and that RahimK advantage is not so obvious.
Let's try this again. You looked at mine and his games and you are saying that:
CMS will not lose to me? Yes or no, will do fine.
Originally posted by RahimK"I wanted to say that these games can finish with all 3 possible results and that RahimK advantage is not so obvious."
Confused.
Let's try this again. You looked at mine and his games and you are saying that:
CMS will not lose to me? Yes or no, will do fine.
Is pretty clear.
Originally posted by KorchAfter winning the game I would comment on it in the forums to show my opponent is a patzer.
If someone is writing personally offensive texts on me, then I`would be agree to beat him in chess with pleasure. And after winning the game I would comment it in forum to show him as patzer 🙂
What great advice!
