07 Feb '13 10:11>
Hi,
So, one of the 'innovations' that has appeared while I disappeared off the site for over 5 years is that the game opening is identified once the game is over.
I've used this a couple of times to do some low-level research on openings. Something I'm not terribly familiar with.
Apparently in this game we engaged in a... (deep breath) Lundin (Kevitz-Mikenas) defence.
Game 9809205
When I looked this up in a (randomly selected) online database, it seemed to suggest that my 2nd move was an exceptionally WEAK one - it led to black losing far more often than the alternative moves.
This rather surprised me given that I had a great deal of success in the early part of the game, nabbing several pieces. I subsequently made a mid-game blunder that caused a scramble to regain control, but the opening part of the game seemed to go very well.
Did I just get lucky? Do people agree that my 2nd move was weak? If so, can you explain why?
Thanks in advance.
So, one of the 'innovations' that has appeared while I disappeared off the site for over 5 years is that the game opening is identified once the game is over.
I've used this a couple of times to do some low-level research on openings. Something I'm not terribly familiar with.
Apparently in this game we engaged in a... (deep breath) Lundin (Kevitz-Mikenas) defence.
Game 9809205
When I looked this up in a (randomly selected) online database, it seemed to suggest that my 2nd move was an exceptionally WEAK one - it led to black losing far more often than the alternative moves.
This rather surprised me given that I had a great deal of success in the early part of the game, nabbing several pieces. I subsequently made a mid-game blunder that caused a scramble to regain control, but the opening part of the game seemed to go very well.
Did I just get lucky? Do people agree that my 2nd move was weak? If so, can you explain why?
Thanks in advance.