2 edits
Originally posted by ItalyBoyBluei think there is still one chance for topalov to prove himself : game 5.
I for one don't feel that we should have gotten to the tiebreakers. I think that Kramnik rightfully proved that he is the superior player.
HOWEVER, I feel very lucky to get to witness at least four extra games between the two.
kramnik has not really won yet - he is a victim - but not yet a victor.
however if kramnik proves himself via the knockout - then yes he wins.
Originally posted by flexmorefunny how kramnik has managed to create a situation, where only him winning is a 'fair' outcome. every other outcome seems to leave something to bicker about. and he did it by sitting outside of a loo, deliberately running his clock down.
i think there is still one chance for topalov to prove himself : game 5.
kramnik has not really won yet - he is a victim - but not yet a victor.
however if kramnik proves himself via the knockout - then yes he wins.
that's some deep positional maneuvering.
Originally posted by wormwoodIt's not always the more agressive player that wins... I think Topalov is gonna to learn that lesson today.
funny how kramnik has managed to create a situation, where only him winning is a 'fair' outcome. every other outcome seems to leave something to bicker about. and he did it by sitting outside of a loo, deliberately running his clock down.
that's some deep positional maneuvering.
Originally posted by wormwoodhe has won more games otb - that is what this is about isn't it?
funny how kramnik has managed to create a situation, where only him winning is a 'fair' outcome. every other outcome seems to leave something to bicker about. and he did it by sitting outside of a loo, deliberately running his clock down.
that's some deep positional maneuvering.