1. Joined
    15 Jun '06
    Moves
    16334
    25 Jun '11 04:203 edits
    I was walking down the sidewalk this morning when I ran across this complete numpty. He had his gate open blocking the pathway with his dead care blocking the street.

    I was going to give him a good tongue lashing when he said, "Oh good morning eh? He was sure going to get it then when I said, "Hey hows it going? you need some help?"

    WHAT??? Did that really come out of my mouth? Yes and the more unbelievable aspect is that I actually helped him push his car.

    I might as well cut off my scrotum and use it as a dunce cap.

    Anyway today's patterns.



    and




    Thats a nifty little mate if I do say so myself.

    Now the position in question.




    If the first thing that you see is that your bishop on b3 is under attack then SHAME ON YOU! The first thing you should see is the fantasy pattern I just showed you!

    Just imagine the black pawns on the h file suddenly disappearing and walla!



    To make the pawns disappear with a rook sac on h7 should lead you to two candidate moves 1.Rxh5 and 1.0-0-0... isn't that amazing? Two moves that you might never have considered are now your candidates!

    Now before we start calculating we we start counting. It takes two moves to play 0-0-0 and Rxh5. What can black do in two moves? Well he can take your bishop and a pawn threatening to queen but is that so dangerous? Lets see...



    In the end when he had to interpose with his bishop... what if he had another piece defending h6? Then this sacrifice wouldn't work. This begs the question.. Can he get a piece to defend that square? If so which piece and which square? In this case the answer is yes he can get the knight to the f5 square via d6... well ok can he get a piece to the defense of the h7 square which would be even better? No! Awesome!



    Is this black's best defense? What if you played 1.Rxh5 first is it any different? Well, my friend these are questions for you to answer for yourself. 😉
  2. c6
    Joined
    19 Dec '04
    Moves
    7355
    25 Jun '11 13:06
    Very slick.
  3. Joined
    15 Jun '06
    Moves
    16334
    26 Jun '11 20:36
    Originally posted by EinZweiDrei
    Very slick.
    Thanks. Im trying to make a blog on here.
  4. Joined
    06 Apr '11
    Moves
    4045
    27 Jun '11 08:13
    In your last example, why not 3. ... Nxe7 instead of Qg1?

    if the refutation for this is not even worth discussing, I apologize in advance for my blindness.

    -Jenn
  5. Joined
    29 Aug '09
    Moves
    1574
    27 Jun '11 08:24
    If 3...Nxe7 instead of 3...Qg1+

    We would wanna check all checks.

    And we would then discover 4.Rxh7+ Kh8 5.Rxg7+ Kxg7 6.Qh6+ Kg8 7.Qh7#
  6. Joined
    08 Apr '09
    Moves
    19509
    27 Jun '11 12:37
    And why not 1... Nf6? This protects h7 and the pawn capture is not a solution for the same reason. Probably the timing is wrong, but I don't have a chess set with me to verify this.
  7. Joined
    05 Jun '11
    Moves
    521
    27 Jun '11 16:19
    Awesome post TT. This is how tactics should be taught. Would be great to see a
    regular blog!

    Tvo, if 1...Nf6 then the simple pawn capture is winning as the g7 bishop is en prise (so no time lost).
  8. Joined
    15 Jun '06
    Moves
    16334
    28 Jun '11 05:04
    Originally posted by Elmyr
    Awesome post TT. This is how tactics should be taught. Would be great to see a
    regular blog!

    Tvo, if 1...Nf6 then the simple pawn capture is winning as the g7 bishop is en prise (so no time lost).
    Thanks. Hopefully I can continue to improve my chess and blogging abilities at the same time.
  9. Joined
    15 Jun '06
    Moves
    16334
    29 Jun '11 05:55
    Originally posted by Elmyr
    Awesome post TT. This is how tactics should be taught. Would be great to see a
    regular blog!

    Tvo, if 1...Nf6 then the simple pawn capture is winning as the g7 bishop is en prise (so no time lost).
    On future threads I might also show a few positions with similar patterns show the tactics and then alert the reader to the positional similarities that lead to such tactics.
  10. e4
    Joined
    06 May '08
    Moves
    42492
    29 Jun '11 13:211 edit
    Hi TT.

    Just adding a footnote.

    The Mating Patern:


    Is called Anastasia's Mate. Anastasia was the heroine of a book
    written in the early 1800's in which this pattern appeared.
    (though according to Hooper and Whyld it was another position that
    the author called Anastasia's Mate. Chess is full of such riddles.)

    It is seen in all it's beauty in a trap lurking in the Open Ruy Lopez.
    Here is an OTB example.

    Berryman - Straat, Hastings 1919



    Quite a few examples on RHP.
    Here is one with White and one with Black.

    zzyw - pontodeluz RHP 2008



    foomip - Scobie RHP 2008

  11. Joined
    15 Jun '06
    Moves
    16334
    29 Jun '11 17:593 edits
    Originally posted by Jenn1482
    In your last example, why not 3. ... Nxe7 instead of Qg1?

    if the refutation for this is not even worth discussing, I apologize in advance for my blindness.

    -Jenn
  12. Joined
    15 Jun '06
    Moves
    16334
    29 Jun '11 18:03
    Originally posted by greenpawn34
    Hi TT.

    Just adding a footnote.

    The Mating Patern:

    [fen]5r2/4Nppk/8/7R/8/8/8/8 b - - 0 1[/fen]
    Is called Anastasia's Mate. Anastasia was the heroine of a book
    written in the early 1800's in which this pattern appeared.
    (though according to Hooper and Whyld it was another position that
    the author called Anastasia's Mate. Chess is full of suc ...[text shortened]... 0 1"]
    1... Qf4 {Black has seen it. White has missed it.} 2. Nd3 Qxh2+ 3. Kxh2 Rh4[/pgn]
    Thanks for the input GP. Do you think it would be a good idea if I tried to put a name to all the patterns I show? I thought about that but I didn't know how helpful it would actually be.
  13. e4
    Joined
    06 May '08
    Moves
    42492
    29 Jun '11 20:00
    Naming the mates actually helps you recall and discuss them.

    "Last night I had that mate where you sac a Queen and mate
    the smothered King with a Knight."

    'Phildors Legacy'.

    Legal's mate, the Dovetail, the Epaulette....

    It's why openings have names.

    "What opening do you play?"

    "1. e4 c5 2. Nf3 d6 3. d4 cxd4 4. Nxd4 Nf6 5. Nc3 a6."

    Easier to say the Najdorf.

    Also good to give a piece of chess history, remember the three 'I's.
    Inform, Instruct...I cannot remember the last one. 😉

    (Interesting, Infectious...Idiots.)
  14. Joined
    15 Jun '06
    Moves
    16334
    25 Jul '11 22:07
    Originally posted by greenpawn34
    Naming the mates actually helps you recall and discuss them.

    "Last night I had that mate where you sac a Queen and mate
    the smothered King with a Knight."

    'Phildors Legacy'.

    Legal's mate, the Dovetail, the Epaulette....

    It's why openings have names.

    "What opening do you play?"

    "1. e4 c5 2. Nf3 d6 3. d4 cxd4 4. Nxd4 Nf6 5. Nc3 a6."

    ...[text shortened]... Instruct...I cannot remember the last one. 😉

    (Interesting, Infectious...Idiots.)
    I actually tested this out on myself and others. Remembering the name didn't help my performance at all(probably why I didn't think of doing this) but it helped other unamed specimen a ton more than I had reckon'd on. Thanks for this piece of advice even though this is only half post and half bump. 😛
  15. Joined
    19 Mar '10
    Moves
    27475
    25 Jul '11 23:34
    If I remember correctly, "How to Beat Your Dad at Chess" by Murray Chandler has a rather large collection of named mating patterns. Not a bad book to look into.
Back to Top

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.I Agree