Originally posted by PhlabibitMaybe that's the answer to stop cheating, then.
Yes
Put in the TOS that by subscribing, you're agreeing if you're "convicted" of cheating by a panel of unbiased RHP players after careful consideration of the evidence and a chance to defend yourself, you're out and you don't get your money back.
There's no reason why such a provision wouldn't be binding.
Originally posted by diskamylWhy is it ridiculous?If no refund a site owner might find himself in a courtroom trying to prove the user really did cheat.A not so appealing prospect.
is this a joke? it must be. I don't know if russ has legal obligations about this, but this is ridiculous.
It's why I think bannings aren't so effective(they come back anyway).A better system would be to tag them and prohibit from tournaments.But that's just my opinion.
Originally posted by PhlabibitDo not return the money!
Yes
Establish a field in which every player (member or not) can use engines;
Establish a field for members only (non-engine users) and another for members only (engine users);
Do not return the money!
Establish mix fields as mentioned above;
Reward me for my bright ideas with three free 1 year subscriptions, which I will pass them to three friends of mine which they are regulars here at RHP;
Do not ret...
😵
Originally posted by TyrannosauruschexI doubt that,I think most reckon they will get caught eventually.
But at least you destroy all their acomplishments and force them to start from the bottom again - eventually people would tire of that sort of thing.
Besides,by tagging and prohibiting you destroy it just the same; no more tournaments and would you play a tagged player?It has the added benefit of subscribers having to pay for a second account if they want to start anew.
