Go back
was I right to accept a draw?

was I right to accept a draw?

Only Chess

Clock
Vote Up
Vote Down

Game 1436634

I was a pawn up and tempted to play on, but I thought I might be forced to go after the a pawn and then lose the rest. Was I right to accept a draw?

Clock
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by zanussi
Game 1436634

I was a pawn up and tempted to play on, but I thought I might be forced to go after the a pawn and then lose the rest. Was I right to accept a draw?
I believe so.

Clock
Vote Up
Vote Down

I think you should have played on. The centerpawns were pretty much untouchable, you could go after the a-pawn, and advance the center pawns if your opponent defended the a-pawn.

Clock
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by zanussi
Game 1436634

I was a pawn up and tempted to play on, but I thought I might be forced to go after the a pawn and then lose the rest. Was I right to accept a draw?
Unless I had a grand plan I'd take it gracefully.

Clock
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Mephisto2
I think you should have played on.
Agreed. A Pawn up, with two passed Pawns versus one.

Clock
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Bowmann
Agreed. A Pawn up, with two passed Pawns versus one.
Especially as I don't think black can keep the passed pawn after 54. Kb2, either black loses the pawn or white gets overwhelming promotion threats.

Clock
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by DeepThought
Especially as I don't think black can keep the passed pawn after 54. Kb2, either black loses the pawn or white gets overwhelming promotion threats.
I am not very good at this....but i feel in this kinda position i'd rather have a knight than a bishop. Once u have ur pawns on the opposite colour squares, there is no way the bishop can get rid of them. With the knight, there is a lot of scope for forks. And as already said, with 2 (strong) passed pawns, against 1 (weak) A-pawn, i think u had a better chance.

Clock
3 edits
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by gaurav2711
I am not very good at this....but i feel in this kinda position i'd rather have a knight than a bishop. Once u have ur pawns on the opposite colour squares, there is no way the bishop can get rid of them. With the knight, there is a lot of scope for forks. And as already said, with 2 (strong) passed pawns, against 1 (weak) A-pawn, i think u had a better chance.
Nope, in this possition the bishop is stronger then the knight because there are pawns on both sides of the board and the bishop is extremly good at stoping passed pawns in the endgame while the knight is very bad at this.

Clock
Vote Up
Vote Down

White has to block the a-Pawn, so...
54.Kb2 Kb4 55.g4
To block the B from the c8-h3 diagonal
55...a3+
Not 55...hxg4 56.d6
56.Ka2
If 56.Kc2 hxg4 57.d6 a2 58.Kb2 g3 59.hxg3 Bh3 should draw without difficulty
56...hxg4 57.d6 g3 58.hxg3
White can try to avoid the draw with 58.d7 gxh2 59.d8Q h1Q and the result is unclear
58...Bh3 59.e5 Be6+ 60.Ka1 Kc5 should draw.

Clock
Vote Up
Vote Down

I think even though this may be a draw, you should definitely fight on. What's the point in not? You should win or draw this position 99% of the time.

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.