Originally posted by buffalobill The Advance Variation is said to score better at the top level. I'm going to give it a bash - the Bronstein-Larsen is too drawish for my liking.
Game 1687059 TNG's a Caro player. In my other game with him we were heading down the exact same line, so I varied a little - now he's got threats.
Yup yup, drawish and that's what I hate especially if your trying to win with white. I'm trying to learn the advanced.
CK players love an endgame. Not too many complications, a solid game, and yes, CK often gives black an equal and even a better endgame. Next the CK masochists (thats a compliment!) have fun in a 90 move endgame to slowly push you over the board.
The answer to your question: With the above in mind, make a mess of it. Sacrifice a pawn, make things complicated, tactical, slippery, impossible.........so ONE BIG MESS !
One could consider the 2K variation, but no guarantee. How about 2 b4 or so. The more mess the better, for thats the type of play CK guys dislike. And guess what....if your opponent does not feel comfortable in a type of position you have a good chance to beat him. (or her)
Originally posted by Sir Loosalot different point of view:
CK players love an endgame. Not too many complications, a solid game, and yes, CK often gives black an equal and even a better endgame. Next the CK masochists (thats a compliment!) have fun in a 90 move endgame to slowly push you over the board.
The answer to your question: With the above in mind, make a mess of it. Sacrif ...[text shortened]... es not feel comfortable in a type of position you have a good chance to beat him. (or her)
SL
I'll check out the advanced for now and see how that goes. Sort of like a french but with there bishop outside the pawn chain.