23 Mar '11 17:23>2 edits
Originally posted by atticus2I know what you're getting at. but isn't being exposed to those challenging ideas the very thing that eventually forces them to develop the related concepts? would it happen in isolation at all? I kinda doubt it.
You can start kids off quite early, provided you limit the exercise to setting up the board, messing with the different pieces. Maybe by age 5 or so, play a game of Q v. pawns.
The point is this. Children simply [b]cannot learn faster than their brain develops. That involves conceptual development. So for example, you can train a child to say ever saw a chess set until then, but took to the game thereafter, they'd be just fine.[/b]
I'm also not at all convinced that the most important aspects of chess ability require any conceptual understanding at all, meaning especially the board vision. - sure the kid won't be able to grasp concepts like capture, piece value, mate, stalemate, or rules in general at first, or temporal depth. but he will be able to see the board, just see, the 8x8 grid, square colors, diagonals, the shape of pieces, and familiarize himself with that visual scenery. develop the 'hardware', so to speak, when their very basic sensory abilities are still developing.
I don't know how well you still remember what it was like to look at a position in the beginning, but for me it's still so close (6 years) I remember it well. it was a total black & white swirling chaos of squares and pieces, the brain just couldn't make any sense of it. even after learning the rules, the board was a total mess which simply would not stick in the mind at all. it was not a problem of understanding concepts, it was a problem of seeing the position. you saw maybe a 3x3 part of it at any single time, and the second you moved your eye, the part you left behind was all a scramble. you couldn't even follow the diagonals across the board because the eye 'skipped' to the next diagonal and you suddenly had two bishops of the same colour, stuff like that.
sure we're primates, and hence born with a basic set of visual functionality. but if newborn kittens can develop the specific functionality of seeing vertical and horizontal lines, I'm sure a primate can do the same (as far as board vision is concerned) no matter how young he is.
assuming that, it must be an order of magnitude easier for the child to internalize the conceptual aspects of chess AFTER developing at least some board vision, than before his brain is even remotely capable of processing the 8x8 grid as anything else than a swirling chaos.