1. Edmonton, Alberta
    Joined
    25 Nov '04
    Moves
    2101
    18 Feb '07 19:02


    White to move.
  2. Standard memberKorch
    Chess Warrior
    Riga
    Joined
    05 Jan '05
    Moves
    24932
    18 Feb '07 19:04
    Originally posted by RahimK
    [fen]1r2r1k1/2q2p1p/b2p1npB/2pP4/1n1bNP2/1P4PB/3Q3P/1R2R1K1 w - - 0 1[/fen]

    White to move.
    In blitz or bullet I would play 1.Qxd4 without doubt 🙂
  3. Atlanta, GA, USA
    Joined
    04 Jun '06
    Moves
    9201
    18 Feb '07 19:08
    Qxd4 looks good. Black definitely cannot take the Q.

    BV
  4. Standard memberwormwood
    If Theres Hell Below
    We're All Gonna Go!
    Joined
    10 Sep '05
    Moves
    10228
    18 Feb '07 19:101 edit
    isn't Qxb4 even better?


    oh right, white's in check. 😛
  5. Edmonton, Alberta
    Joined
    25 Nov '04
    Moves
    2101
    18 Feb '07 19:10
    Please continue the line further.

    1.Qxd4 ___
  6. Edmonton, Alberta
    Joined
    25 Nov '04
    Moves
    2101
    18 Feb '07 19:11
    Originally posted by wormwood
    isn't Qxb4 even better?
    The check my cts friend!

    Slow tactics 😛
  7. Standard memberKirwan
    Mel Kirwan
    Hauxton
    Joined
    20 Nov '05
    Moves
    17764
    18 Feb '07 19:13
    Originally posted by RahimK
    Please continue the line further.

    1.Qxd4 ___
    If p x Q
    Nxf6+ Kh8
    Rxe8+ RxR
    B g7+ KxB
    N x e8+

    possibly?
  8. Standard memberStewartChess
    somethin clever here
    Joined
    10 Feb '07
    Moves
    2542
    18 Feb '07 19:142 edits
    Originally posted by wormwood
    isn't Qxb4 even better?


    oh right, white's in check. 😛
    edit: scratch that.
  9. Standard memberStewartChess
    somethin clever here
    Joined
    10 Feb '07
    Moves
    2542
    18 Feb '07 19:18
    1.Qxd4 cxd4
    2.Nxf6+ Kh8
    3.Rxe8+ Rxe8
    4.Bg7+!! Kxg7
    5.Nxe8+
  10. Standard memberStewartChess
    somethin clever here
    Joined
    10 Feb '07
    Moves
    2542
    18 Feb '07 19:19
    you beat me to it! haha
  11. Edmonton, Alberta
    Joined
    25 Nov '04
    Moves
    2101
    18 Feb '07 19:23
    Originally posted by Kirwan
    If p x Q
    Nxf6+ Kh8
    Rxe8+ RxR
    B g7+ KxB
    N x e8+

    possibly?
    Ah, you found Bg7+!!

    Brillant.


    This was really a test for you fast tactics supporters.

    Wormwood and Jusuh, honeslty would you have found Bg7+?

    Because Nxe8 instead of Bg7+ and black is winning.

    That's why I prefer slow tactics. You still get the patterns instilled in your brain (slower then fast tactics) but you build calculation as the same time.

    So if you get this position in OTB, you clock is ticking, sure you see Qxd4 is good, but would you play it?

    If you calculate wrong, you might see Nxe8 instead of Bg7+ and not sac your queen. You might play some other move, and lose the game.

    Or you might calculate right, and play Bg7+ and win the game.

    My name is Rahim, and I am a supporter of slow tactics 🙂

    Just an opinion, but instead of doing fast tactics and then learning to calculate,

    Why not do slow tactics and learn to calculate at the same time? It's 2 for 1. After enough slow tactics, the patterns will stick in your head, and it will be just like doing fast tactics.
  12. back in business
    Joined
    25 Aug '04
    Moves
    1264
    18 Feb '07 19:451 edit
    Originally posted by RahimK


    Wormwood and Jusuh, honeslty would you have found Bg7+?
    in a long game, yes. no doubt.

    in a bullet game, no. but still I would have played Qxd4 instantly and maybe see it after ...Kh8. hard to say.

    my name is not rahim and i am not supporter of slow tactics.
  13. Edmonton, Alberta
    Joined
    25 Nov '04
    Moves
    2101
    18 Feb '07 19:49
    Originally posted by Jusuh
    in a long game, yes. no doubt.

    in a bullet game, no. but still I would have played Qxd4 instantly and maybe see it after ...Kh8. hard to say.

    my name is not rahim and i am not supporter of slow tactics.
    Fair enough.

    You taken the Yasser Seirwans, winning chess tactics exam?
  14. back in business
    Joined
    25 Aug '04
    Moves
    1264
    18 Feb '07 19:53
    nope. never heard of it.

    can I take it online?
  15. Edmonton, Alberta
    Joined
    25 Nov '04
    Moves
    2101
    18 Feb '07 20:06
    Originally posted by Jusuh
    nope. never heard of it.

    can I take it online?
    It's from his book,

    Winning Chess Tactics.

    Teaches you tactics and then at the end there are 45 questions.

    15, 0-1500
    15, 1500-2000
    15, 2000+


    Approximate ratings for them. Pretty tough questions. I tried the hardest ones once when I was reading the book.

    That book is popular. Maybe the public library has it?
Back to Top

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.I Agree