1. Account suspended
    Joined
    07 Feb '07
    Moves
    62961
    19 Sep '08 21:53
    Originally posted by diskamyl
    wow, that was so weird! I was surprised when learning the exact same rule here in the forums a couple of months ago, and I had felt like a complete patzer, was ashamed of not knowing the rule.
    Korchnoi knew the rule, he was just suffering from the stress and blew a synapse.
  2. New Braunfels, Texas
    Joined
    22 Aug '07
    Moves
    72283
    19 Sep '08 22:48
    Originally posted by MontyMoose
    Let people think about it and I'll post the answer later today.
    Unless, of course, Sam comes along SEVEN minutes later and blabs the answer. 😠
  3. Account suspended
    Joined
    07 Feb '07
    Moves
    62961
    20 Sep '08 18:07
    Originally posted by MontyMoose
    Unless, of course, Sam comes along SEVEN minutes later and blabs the answer. 😠
    Not to worry, it doesn't look like anyone cared.
  4. ALG
    Joined
    16 Dec '07
    Moves
    6190
    20 Sep '08 18:351 edit
    Originally posted by MontyMoose
    In 1972 the rules for castling were changed. A requirement was added that the King and Rook must be on the same RANK. It would seem the requirement that neither King nor the Rook involved has moved would ensure they were on the same rank (original squares). Why was this change necessary? Let people think about it and I'll post the answer later today.
    Because first it was legal to castle with promoted rooks.
Back to Top

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.I Agree