19 Aug '11 14:34>
Originally posted by greenpawn34
You are moaning because after you won his Queen he had not moved in your game.
(if you had looked past your games you would have seen he was not moving
in a few all other games as well.)
Again you are jumping into the wrong conclusions by not reading CAREFULLY my posts. I said:
And I know he is still active, because he is moving in his other games.
Did you just not see that? How can someone blogging in this website ABOUT CHESS have such a low attention to detail? I am sorry but I was very careful when wording my post to avoid comments like that and not to offend anybody.
Which is why I did not put the guys nick or a link to the game. Of course some people's curiosity would lead them to try and find that game and start arguing without any real point.
Would you have still moaned if you had not win his Queen and he was taking
time to consider his move?
Obviously not but at the same time if it was a position that is so obvious and forced and does not warrant thought I would become sceptical of what is going on.
You posted.
"By sitting on the game like that he does not let me play any new games."
This to me and other poster seemed to suggest you want to start a new game
but cannot because your opponent won't resign or hurry up and get mated.
Then you add in your opinion such a postion did not warrent a 7 day thought.
Leave the lad alone, stop bulllying him in public. He can take as long as likes.
You agreed to the time controls when the game started. End of......
Again I did not bully anyone. I did not use his name or said who he was. I think you have completely missunderstood the nature of my post.
Regarding time controls I think that's one of the feeblest arguments one can put forward in correspondence chess. I tend to chose reasonable time outs (although that 7 days timebank is something new for me) that allows for some reasonable freedom in movement. After all we are people. However, one can always abuse this system by just dragging it out. Which is what I think is happening here.
But again perhaps I am wrong.
PS: If you think a "...game like that." has lost all interest then sac back
your Queen for a minor bit. Have some fun.
Great.
What I think, is that such behaviour is unfair to other players that start a game with the best intentions. But then again maybe its only me who is having those experiences? This is completely unheard to you?
You are moaning because after you won his Queen he had not moved in your game.
(if you had looked past your games you would have seen he was not moving
in a few all other games as well.)
Again you are jumping into the wrong conclusions by not reading CAREFULLY my posts. I said:
And I know he is still active, because he is moving in his other games.
Did you just not see that? How can someone blogging in this website ABOUT CHESS have such a low attention to detail? I am sorry but I was very careful when wording my post to avoid comments like that and not to offend anybody.
Which is why I did not put the guys nick or a link to the game. Of course some people's curiosity would lead them to try and find that game and start arguing without any real point.
Would you have still moaned if you had not win his Queen and he was taking
time to consider his move?
Obviously not but at the same time if it was a position that is so obvious and forced and does not warrant thought I would become sceptical of what is going on.
You posted.
"By sitting on the game like that he does not let me play any new games."
This to me and other poster seemed to suggest you want to start a new game
but cannot because your opponent won't resign or hurry up and get mated.
Then you add in your opinion such a postion did not warrent a 7 day thought.
Leave the lad alone, stop bulllying him in public. He can take as long as likes.
You agreed to the time controls when the game started. End of......
Again I did not bully anyone. I did not use his name or said who he was. I think you have completely missunderstood the nature of my post.
Regarding time controls I think that's one of the feeblest arguments one can put forward in correspondence chess. I tend to chose reasonable time outs (although that 7 days timebank is something new for me) that allows for some reasonable freedom in movement. After all we are people. However, one can always abuse this system by just dragging it out. Which is what I think is happening here.
But again perhaps I am wrong.
PS: If you think a "...game like that." has lost all interest then sac back
your Queen for a minor bit. Have some fun.
Great.
What I think, is that such behaviour is unfair to other players that start a game with the best intentions. But then again maybe its only me who is having those experiences? This is completely unheard to you?