Originally posted by greenpawn34
I'm here because I'm here.
"...........but decided to come back after my son was born last month. It gave me
something to do during the late night hours while feeding/changing him, or rocking
him to sleep in my arms."
There is only one person who can feed a one month old baby.
That is the baby's mother.
No wonder you and ...[text shortened]... rgue so much.
You're a woman. Who else but two woman would keep arguing over nothing. 🙂
Greenpawn34, you have brought up the issue (about which you seem ignorant,
I have to say) of the recent disputes between Vivify and me. If you had not,
though *I know* in jest, conjectured what had happened, I would not respond.
(Evidently, writers in another forum have concluded that Vivify's a male writer.)
In fact, it was not until very recently (15 October 2012) that I exchanged any
posts with Vivify (thread "Women and Romney/Ryan" in forum "Debates).
Until then, I had no opinion whatsoever of Vivify. Vivify already was in
protracted disputes with Finnegan and Kevcvs57, of which I had no part.
Vivify claimed (page 6, post 8) that Finnegan (page 6, post 7) had severely
misinterpreted or misrepresented what Vivify had written (page 5, post 7).
Vivify also implied that only Finnegan made such an absurd misinterpretation.
I am qualified to write an exegesis of an English text, so I decided to answer
one question for myself: Did Finnegan make a reasonable interpretation of
Vivify's post (page 5, post 7)? I concluded that Finnegan's interpretation was
reasonable. In addition, Kevcvs57 also seems to have made about the same
interpretation of Vivify's post that Finnegan and I made. It seemed clear to me
that Vivify has persistent serious difficulties in comprehending written English.
Contrary to what he might assume, I did not then comment otherwise on the
merits of Vivify's disputes with Finnegan and Kevcvs57.
Vivify has responded with apparently deep resentment, persistent disingenuous
distortions of the facts, and diverting personal attacks. All that he had to do in
the first place was to admit that he's wrong, but he seems incapable of doing it,
except belatedly on a minor point of fact (which also showed more evidence of
his poor reading comprehension) in that thread. In my question (below), 'error'
refers to admitting any error beyond that minor point of fact in that thread.
"Why does Vivify seem so insecure that he cannot admit to making an error?"
--Duchess64 (15 October 2012, in 'Women and Romney/Ryan'😉
"Because 'error' is a polite way to describe lies."
--Finnegan (16 October 2012, writing to Duchess64 about Vivify)
I have put Vivify into my ignore list, and I am ready to let him keep arguing
with Finnegan and/or Kevcvs57 about their original disputes in that thread.