Originally posted by exigentsky
Yeah, I agree. FICS is much better and has more features. Rating restrictions, takebacks, adjournments, etc. It's not as good as ICC or playchess.com, but it's probably the best free site.
In fact, I just got into trouble because of a real pig taking advantage of the lack of takebacks on uChess. I mouse slipped and played Kd2 instead of Be2 early in th many basic features. I'm definitely not playing on it again until they improve the software.
How do you know he would have played the same move in reply to both Kd2 and Be2? Kd2 may indeed prompt a change in tactics on his part, because now your K is stuck in the center and vulnerable.
And so you wait to ask for the takeback, because you don't want to disturb him when his clock is running. But now, if he accepts your takeback, the time he spent plotting a response to Kd2 is wasted.
If he accepts the takeback, he runs the risk that you might do the same thing that he actually did to you, i.e. you might leave your Rook on e1 [centralized] instead of doing the 'honorable' thing and move it back to f1.
If he does cooperate with the takeback, and gets into a bad position, he will be distracted by that old position with Kd2 and how much easier the game would have been if he had just played on from there.
And finally, if he later makes an odious blunder, and asks for a takeback, you probably will not give it to him because it was not a mouse slip. He will be left wondering if a mouse slip is really so different from an odious blunder that one should be taken back and the other should not. Aren't both borne of carelessness? Don't both spoil the quality of the game?
For these reasons, I oppose takebacks and think your anger at your opponent is largely misplaced. Sure, he could have behaved more honorably. But he is not to blame for your slip.