Originally posted by prosoccer
This is a game recently where I made a big blunder (obviously), my question is whether you think the outcome was justified, or whether one player should have one (give a winning line).
White should have played on. I am not sure he can win, but he appears to have all the winning chances.
For starters, he has the choice of winning the e6 pawn or the c4 pawn:
1...Kh7 2.Qg4+ Kh7 3.Rxf8 Qxf8 4.Qxc4, or 1...Kh7 2.Qh5+ Kg7 3.Qe5+ Kh7 4.Rxf8 Qxf8 5.Qxe6.
In both of these lines, White has an extra pawn, and Black's King is more exposed than White's. This gives White the continual threat of Queen checks that pick off more pawns, or force a perpetual, should things turn in Black's favor. I am not sure that White can win, but he risks little by trying.