Originally posted by SirLoseALoti would agree with the whole "community" thing-mike killed the GK community, the IYT forums are a mess, and i've never heard of half the other chess sites...😛
I'm only here since a short while,but in my humble opinion it's the community here that makes this site stand out.
The people make the difference!😏
Originally posted by LivingLegendSorry, chessfriend, but how are your maths? It's $ 5.95/month x 12 = $ 71.4/year. Far way off from $ 15. Unless my Japanese calculator lets me down...
It's 15$/year here too, and some people here play up to 400 games...what is all the fuzz about, RHP is just the best, and that is not one man's opinion, but a fact!😕
Olav
Cheerio!
Jan
PS
Just have a quick peep at ChessWorld.net and you'll see what they have to offer that price: realistic Java design, nice layout, etc. This doesn't mean you should let RHP down. By all means: no!
Originally posted by Jan Pot, Antwerpe (BelgiuRHP has two options for subscription. One is at a monthly rate of 5.95, and the other is an annual rate of 14.95.
Sorry, chessfriend, but how are your maths? It's $ 5.95/month x 12 = $ 71.4/year. Far way off from $ 15. Unless my Japanese calculator lets me down...
Cheerio!
Jan
PS
Just have a quick peep at ChessWorld.net and you'll see what they have to offer that price: realistic Java design, nice layout, etc. This doesn't mean you should let RHP down. By all means: no!
Marc
Originally posted by Jan Pot, Antwerpe (BelgiuThe calculator certainly isn't letting you down....your eyes are...😕
Sorry, chessfriend, but how are your maths? It's $ 5.95/month x 12 = $ 71.4/year. Far way off from $ 15. Unless my Japanese calculator lets me down...
Cheerio!
Jan
PS
Just have a quick peep at ChessWorld.net and you'll see what they have to offer that price: realistic Java design, nice layout, etc. This doesn't mean you should let RHP down. By all means: no!
Olav
Originally posted by dylIt's Dutch. But English is no problem (Cambridge Diploma looon ago), but when I looked for the membership fee I only saw (bad eyes? lack of concentration? impatience?...) the monthly fee. Nevertheles, I didn't think that a monthly subscription at $ 4.95 would -disproportinately- add up to a $ 14.95/year.
lol, okok, go easy on him. I'm guessing english isn't his first language.
Cheerio!
Jan
Originally posted by Jan Pot, Antwerpe (BelgiuAh, you mentioned a japanese calculator is all.
It's Dutch. But English is no problem (Cambridge Diploma looon ago), but when I looked for the membership fee I only saw (bad eyes? lack of concentration? impatience?...) the monthly fee. Nevertheles, I didn't think that a monthly subscription at $ 4.95 would -disproportinately- add up to a $ 14.95/year.
Cheerio!
Jan
I presume the reason it's $4.95 per month is anything less wouldn't be worthwhile.
Hooroo!
Originally posted by Jan Pot, Antwerpe (BelgiuMaybe it's a marketing ploy to encourage people to subscribe for a year at a time rather than every month.
It's Dutch. But English is no problem (Cambridge Diploma looon ago), but when I looked for the membership fee I only saw (bad eyes? lack of concentration? impatience?...) the monthly fee. Nevertheles, I didn't think that a monthly subscription at $ 4.95 would -disproportinately- add up to a $ 14.95/year.
Cheerio!
Jan
regards,
Marc