Personally, I'm pretty classical. As white, Ruy Lopez except in tournaments when, for variation (and to help me tell these games apart), it's also c4 and d4. I'm much enamoured with the 3. Bb5 against the Sicilian (Rossolimo and Moscow variations) but I wish there was more theory around.
As Black, I don't have a preference and my response depends on white.
did you have a thread about 2.c3 at some point? I've been trying to pick it up recently, and it would be great to read someone's personal thoughts on it.
as white 1.f4-Nf3-g6, as black the dragon. 1900-2000 here.
Originally posted by vipiu why not worth?
For me it is a big goal...
At the time I thought it wion't be worth it because I had two IM-Norms already, but couldn't get the third one. I also struggled to get over 2400 Elo.
But for being a FM you really don't have to achieve anything. Ok, you need to play I think 60 games with an average Rating performance of 2300. But that's it!!!!
But nevermind. It's not worth thinking about it now, because I do't play a lot of OTB chess these days.
Originally posted by wormwood did you have a thread about 2.c3 at some point? I've been trying to pick it up recently, and it would be great to read someone's personal thoughts on it.
as white 1.f4-Nf3-g6, as black the dragon. 1900-2000 here.
There are many threads in which I have recommended Sicilian 2.c3 🙂
Originally posted by Outpost There should be a lot of Sergei Tiviakov games playing the Sicilian Alapin. Chessbase.com perhaps.
He seems to be the strongest player using 2.c3 Sicilian. Also I would suggest to check out games by Sveshnikov, Sermek, Rausis, Rozentalis, Pavasovic etc.
White : The Ruy Lopez and sometimes the Bird.
Black : Any Sicilian, lately i tend to play the Najdorf , just as a learning experience.
Against 1 ....d4 , the Queens Indian or Bogo, 99% i start with 1....Nf6, 2...e6.