Originally posted by FabianFnas
You say my reasoning is flawed but you don't say why and where.
Do you honestly say that there is no sound anywhere (anywhere at all?) in space even if you don't consider the Earth as a part of space?
Or do you say that space is vacuum and nothing but vaccum and empty space?
It is a widespread myth that no one can hear you scream in space.
In vacuum, yes, but inside a spacesuit a scream can be horrifyingly loud.
oh my. this is a semantics conflict, not a physics conflict.
"space" is being used as a general term, rather than more precise language.
"sound" needs molecules to happen. "sound" doesn't happen in a vacuum.
"space" isn't a perfect vacuum, but the number of molecules that would be needed to register a sound don't exist in a "near perfect vacuum" that is being called "space" in this discussion.
a place (or a compartment) that has enough molecular denisty sufficient to produce a "sound" that is audible (hearable) to a human ear is not "space," although it does exist in a place that takes up space.
so, if an RHP argument is stated in space so that no one can hear it, is it still inane?