Go back
Beads

Beads

Posers and Puzzles

r
CHAOS GHOST!!!

Elsewhere

Joined
29 Nov 02
Moves
17317
Clock
19 Apr 06
Vote Up
Vote Down

This is the general case of something relatively easy, but presumably it involves a lot of legwork.

Given n beads and some partition of {1,2,...n} into m subsets of size k(1), k(2),...k(m), let the beads of each subset be given a different colour (ie, we have k(1) white beads, k(2) yellow ones, etc). How many essentially different necklaces (arrangement of beads in a circle) are possible?

l

Joined
12 Apr 06
Moves
202
Clock
19 Apr 06
Vote Up
Vote Down

an infinite number - circles can be infinitely big

F

Joined
11 Nov 05
Moves
43938
Clock
19 Apr 06
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by laur3tta
an infinite number - circles can be infinitely big
In theory - yes.
In reality - no.
The known universe is not large enough...

r
CHAOS GHOST!!!

Elsewhere

Joined
29 Nov 02
Moves
17317
Clock
19 Apr 06
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by laur3tta
an infinite number - circles can be infinitely big
I mean, how many essentially different cyclical orderings of the beads are possible?

h

Joined
04 Jan 04
Moves
25350
Clock
19 Apr 06
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by royalchicken
I mean, how many essentially different cyclical orderings of the beads are possible?
Do reflections count as distinct?

r
CHAOS GHOST!!!

Elsewhere

Joined
29 Nov 02
Moves
17317
Clock
20 Apr 06
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by howardbradley
Do reflections count as distinct?
No, nor do rotations.

h

Joined
04 Jan 04
Moves
25350
Clock
20 Apr 06
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by royalchicken
No, nor do rotations.
Further clarification required.

If we have just two beads (and two possible colours) are the possibilities:
i) YW
or ii) YW and YY
or iii) YW, YY and WW

Similarly, for three beads, is YYW different from YWW?

r
CHAOS GHOST!!!

Elsewhere

Joined
29 Nov 02
Moves
17317
Clock
20 Apr 06
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by howardbradley
Further clarification required.

If we have just two beads (and two possible colours) are the possibilities:
i) YW
or ii) YW and YY
or iii) YW, YY and WW

Similarly, for three beads, is YYW different from YWW?
It doesn't really matter, since the factor by which this changes things is simple, so I'll say no.

h

Joined
04 Jan 04
Moves
25350
Clock
24 Apr 06
2 edits
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by royalchicken
This is the general case of something relatively easy, but presumably it involves a lot of legwork.

Given n beads and some partition of {1,2,...n} into m subsets of size k(1), k(2),...k(m), let the beads of each subset be given a different colour (ie, we have k(1) white beads, k(2) yellow ones, etc). How many essentially different necklaces (arrangement of beads in a circle) are possible?
Nope, this has me beat. Aside from a few very specific (and in some cases trivial) results, I can't get anywhere.

A couple of results:
For 3 colours with k(1) = k(2) = 1, and k(3) = p = n-2
N = 1 + int(p/2)

For 4 colours with k(1) = k(2) = k(3) = 1 and k(4) = p = n-3
N = (p+1)(p+2)/2 - the triangle numbers which is a vaguely interesting result.


For fun, I had a program work out necklaces of two colours where k(1) = k(2) = n/2 ie all the necklaces with equal numbers of white and yellow beads. This gives the sequence: 1, 1, 2, 3, 8, 16, 50, 133, 440, 1387, ...
I looked that up in The On-Line Encyclopedia of Integer Sequences (http://www.research.att.com/~njas/sequences - a great resource) and it was there, but I didn't understand the formula :-( Oh well.

h

Joined
04 Jan 04
Moves
25350
Clock
24 Apr 06
Vote Up
Vote Down

OK here's a more general conjecture (nothing more).

For k(1) = k(2) = ... = k(m-1) = 1 and k(m) = p ie a lot of one colour and one each of a lot of colours.

N = 1/2 * (p+m-2)! / p! (m>3)

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.