Originally posted by BigDoggProblemOops, Mephisto is right. I had the parity reversed from what it should be. Since white moved last, the parity of white and black must be different.
Black must have played ...Ng3xRh1, though it does not matter which Knight takes the Rook.
So the solution is that black played ...Nh3xRg1 at some point in the game.
Originally posted by Mephisto2That is correct, Mephisto2.
If black is to play, then knight moves alone cannot have done the job. The only solution for an odd number of moves for white is if black took the rook on g1 with a knight?
Therefore he must have played N(h3)xR(g1).
(Oh, I didn't see your reply, Bigg Dogg.)