1. Joined
    29 Feb '04
    Moves
    22
    05 Apr '05 11:241 edit
    Originally posted by Mephisto2
    In real life, one spends less time going back and forth on a flat road than on a road with hills. Which would be obtained more likely with with the average of the two speeds.
    Where I live it is the opposite.

    Anyway, the bigger the difference between the uphill speed and the downhill speed, the less accurate will be your calculations.
  2. Joined
    12 Mar '03
    Moves
    44411
    05 Apr '05 11:49
    Originally posted by THUDandBLUNDER
    Where I live it is the opposite.

    .
    far from earth?
  3. Joined
    29 Feb '04
    Moves
    22
    05 Apr '05 12:28
    Originally posted by Mephisto2
    In real life, one spends less time going back and forth on a flat road than on a road with hills.
    I thought you meant you live in a hilly area.
    The guy in the puzzle may live in Kansas. 😉
  4. Standard memberBowmann
    Non-Subscriber
    RHP IQ
    Joined
    17 Mar '05
    Moves
    1345
    05 Apr '05 15:021 edit
    Originally posted by THUDandBLUNDER
    That is correct, davegage!

    He can work out the distance from A to B if he takes the same amount of time to go x miles flat & back as he does to go x miles uphill and x miles downhill.

    To put it another way,
    if
    the downhill ...[text shortened]... /(d+u)

    That is, d, f, u, must be in harmonic progression.

    Or...

    Average speed = Total distance / Total time

    Let d be distance between towns A and B.
    Let t be time.

    Then, t = d/72 + d/56 = 2d/63 (after cancelling)

    So, Average speed for whole journey = 2d/(2d/63)

    = 63mph
Back to Top

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.I Agree