Posers and Puzzles

Posers and Puzzles

  1. Joined
    24 Sep '06
    Moves
    3736
    07 Jul '08 21:41
    A degree is defined as one three hundred and sixtieth of a circle. So that doesn't say much about the origin of degrees. Why are there three hundred and sixty of them?
  2. Joined
    13 Dec '06
    Moves
    792
    07 Jul '08 22:15
    Wikipedia is your friend.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Degree_(angle)
  3. Joined
    24 Sep '06
    Moves
    3736
    08 Jul '08 02:42
    Originally posted by GregM
    Wikipedia is your friend.
    Not my friend, sorry.

    I was asking because I found the question to be intellectually stimulating.

    The garbage dispensing network of obtuse obscurities that is wikipedia didn't seem worth while.
  4. Subscribercoquette
    Already mated
    Omaha, Nebraska, USA
    Joined
    04 Jul '06
    Moves
    956428
    08 Jul '08 03:10
    Originally posted by nihilismor
    Not my friend, sorry.

    I was asking because I found the question to be intellectually stimulating.

    The garbage dispensing network of obtuse obscurities that is wikipedia didn't seem worth while.
    Actually, the wikipedia speculation about the historical derivation seemed to be on point. Your response to a helpful suggestion was inappropriate.
  5. Joined
    13 May '08
    Moves
    79741
    08 Jul '08 03:23
    I believe there are 360 degrees in a circle because the ancient people tried to relate it to the number of days it took the sun to go around the earth. Later they found that they where off by a bit and adjsuted their calenders appropriately.

    hklee
  6. Subscribercoquette
    Already mated
    Omaha, Nebraska, USA
    Joined
    04 Jul '06
    Moves
    956428
    08 Jul '08 03:52
    Originally posted by hklee
    I believe there are 360 degrees in a circle because the ancient people tried to relate it to the number of days it took the sun to go around the earth. Later they found that they where off by a bit and adjsuted their calenders appropriately.

    hklee
    yeah, what he said.
  7. Joined
    17 Feb '08
    Moves
    6797
    08 Jul '08 06:57
    Isn't 360 an adoption from the babylonian Base-12 system. Not to mention that so many numbers go into 360.

    The history on the babylonian base-12 is related to counting with the segments on each finger (4*3) So you could count to 156 on your two hands instead of our minuscule 10.
  8. Joined
    11 May '07
    Moves
    14366
    08 Jul '08 13:02
    that sounds clever lets go with that.
  9. Joined
    19 Dec '07
    Moves
    2482
    08 Jul '08 13:07
    i don't under stand. be much much lesss specific if you can
    also the theroy abut the year round long make sense
  10. Joined
    24 Sep '06
    Moves
    3736
    08 Jul '08 19:23
    Originally posted by tamuzi
    Isn't 360 an adoption from the babylonian Base-12 system. Not to mention that so many numbers go into 360.

    The history on the babylonian base-12 is related to counting with the segments on each finger (4*3) So you could count to 156 on your two hands instead of our minuscule 10.
    This is coincides with what I've turned up. However, I have read that they worked with a base 30 system (not 12) which contradicts the website cited earlier in this thread.
  11. Standard memberTheMaster37
    Kupikupopo!
    Out of my mind
    Joined
    25 Oct '02
    Moves
    20443
    09 Jul '08 09:07
    Originally posted by nihilismor
    This is coincides with what I've turned up. However, I have read that they worked with a base 30 system (not 12) which contradicts the website cited earlier in this thread.
    I believe they used base 12. Your reluctance to use wikipedia is based on rumours and probably opinions of others.

    I find it a useful source of knowledge. Moderated regularly so that the information presented is correct. I have contributed my share of information and corrections on that site as well.
  12. ALG
    Joined
    16 Dec '07
    Moves
    6190
    09 Jul '08 14:46
    they used both 12 and 30, 12x30=360, so a circle has 360 degrees
  13. SubscriberAThousandYoung
    iViva la Hispanidad!
    tinyurl.com/y2c6j2t3
    Joined
    23 Aug '04
    Moves
    24791
    10 Jul '08 20:00
    Originally posted by tamuzi
    Isn't 360 an adoption from the babylonian Base-12 system. Not to mention that so many numbers go into 360.

    The history on the babylonian base-12 is related to counting with the segments on each finger (4*3) So you could count to 156 on your two hands instead of our minuscule 10.
    3x4 + 2x2 (thumbs) is 16, not 156.
  14. Joined
    24 Sep '06
    Moves
    3736
    10 Jul '08 22:57
    Originally posted by TheMaster37
    ...Your reluctance to use wikipedia is based on rumours and probably opinions of others...
    You are correct. I also do not go on "myspace" or get chemicals from starbucks or wear clothing with brand names visible for the same reasons I do not use wikipedia without reluctance. I do use it and respect it though in most cases . . . Just not for this forum.
  15. Standard memberwolfgang59
    Mr. Wolf
    at home
    Joined
    09 Jun '07
    Moves
    46043
    11 Jul '08 10:09
    Originally posted by AThousandYoung
    3x4 + 2x2 (thumbs) is 16, not 156.
    3x4 on EACH hand using fingers,
    use one hand for units
    use other hand for '12's
    that gives a possible 12x12 = 144.

    I guess 156 includes using the thumb on the '12's hand??
Back to Top