1. Joined
    08 Dec '03
    Moves
    3140
    03 Jun '04 01:52
    Can you find the two smallest whole numbers where the difference of their squares is a cube, and the difference of their cubes is a square?

    -Ray.
  2. Zeist, Holland
    Joined
    11 Sep '03
    Moves
    19337
    03 Jun '04 09:371 edit
    Guess you forgot the word 'different'?

    0^2-0^2=0^3
    0^3-0^3=0^2

    In case this is true, you could take 6 and 10:

    10^2-6^2 = 100-36 = 64 = 8^3
    10^3-6^3 = 1000-216 = 784 = 28^2

    Are these the smallest?
  3. Standard memberroyalchicken
    CHAOS GHOST!!!
    Elsewhere
    Joined
    29 Nov '02
    Moves
    17317
    03 Jun '04 17:10
    1^3 - 0^3 = 1^2

    1^2 - 0^2 = 1^3
  4. Zeist, Holland
    Joined
    11 Sep '03
    Moves
    19337
    03 Jun '04 17:29
    Originally posted by royalchicken
    1^3 - 0^3 = 1^2

    1^2 - 0^2 = 1^3
    Yes; but that is quite trivial. Maybe we should add the requirement that there is no zero involved?
  5. Joined
    08 Dec '03
    Moves
    3140
    04 Jun '04 00:05
    The problem did request whole numbers. There seems to be ambiguous definitions for the set of whole numbers. In this case, the set of whole numbers was intended to be the set of positive integers.

    In this case, the correct numbers are indeed 6 and 10.

    -Ray.
  6. Zeist, Holland
    Joined
    11 Sep '03
    Moves
    19337
    04 Jun '04 07:48
    The set of whole numbers is: -inf,...,-3,-2,-1,0,1,2,3,...,inf
    Then there are the natural numbers: 0,1,2,3,...,inf
    You wanted the natural numbers^+: 1,2,3,...,inf

    Might be handy to remember; it stops lots of confusion 😀
  7. DonationAcolyte
    Now With Added BA
    Loughborough
    Joined
    04 Jul '02
    Moves
    3790
    04 Jun '04 08:14
    Originally posted by piderman
    The set of whole numbers is: -inf,...,-3,-2,-1,0,1,2,3,...,inf
    Then there are the natural numbers: 0,1,2,3,...,inf
    You wanted the natural numbers^+: 1,2,3,...,inf

    Might be handy to remember; it stops lots of confusion 😀
    I take the natural numbers or N to exclude zero - after all zero was not thought to be a number at all in the past, so it's hardly 'natural' from a human perspective, and it's not really a counting number either, unless you're a computer scientist. If I need to write 'the natural numbers with zero' I write Z subscript(at least 0) (looks better with the appropriate symbols). I suppose I could use Z subscript(strictly greater than 0) instead of N, as that would also be unambiguous.
  8. Standard memberTheMaster37
    Kupikupopo!
    Out of my mind
    Joined
    25 Oct '02
    Moves
    20443
    06 Jun '04 18:05
    Lol, piderman. You give the most trivial solution of all, assume the author meant different numbers, then make a point of someone giving the most trivial solution to your extra condition, you should be more precise in your conditions :p
Back to Top