14 Aug '07 18:38>
Why do longer barrels give greater accuracy? I have an idea, but let me hear what you think (or know).
Originally posted by AThousandYoungI suppose if the barrel is rifled along most of its length, you will impart a greater spin to the bullet with a longer barrel, since the barrel can only impart spin to the bullet while the two are in contact. The spin will stabilize the bullet's path due to conservation of angular momentum.
Why do longer barrels give greater accuracy? I have an idea, but let me hear what you think (or know).
Originally posted by PBE6My suspicion is that the longer barrel gives one two widely separated points to line up with the target.
I suppose if the barrel is rifled along most of its length, you will impart a greater spin to the bullet with a longer barrel, since the barrel can only impart spin to the bullet while the two are in contact. The spin will stabilize the bullet's path due to conservation of angular momentum.
Originally posted by PBE6I believe you are correct, but when did they begin to rifle barrels? In the colonial age, muskets with longer barrels were more accurate than pistols, so the length of the barrel might actually be directly related to accuracy, aside from the the rifling.
I suppose if the barrel is rifled along most of its length, you will impart a greater spin to the bullet with a longer barrel, since the barrel can only impart spin to the bullet while the two are in contact. The spin will stabilize the bullet's path due to conservation of angular momentum.
Originally posted by Drew LBut the spin is determined by the design of the rifling of the barrel, not the length. The bullet engages the rifling. It doesn't rip through it. Does it?
Kentucky Rifle, or long rifle, has many names, was around during the revulotionary war. took 4 times longer to load since you had to jam the lead ball down the barrel while a smooth barrel rolled down. However it had 3 x the range. range and accuracy were basically considered the same back in the day. they were used but the revulotionary war was, for the most ...[text shortened]... uracy.
example i guess would be throwing a football. more spin = increased range and accuracy
Originally posted by AThousandYoungyes it does engage the rifling. However the lead ball is traveling rather quickly [not sure of the fps] , by maximizing the length of the barrel it puts the greatest amount of spin on the lead ball.
But the spin is determined by the design of the rifling of the barrel, not the length. The bullet engages the rifling. It doesn't rip through it. Does it?
Originally posted by Drew LTerrible analogy. The "strength" of the bullet comes from the amount of powder, and the reason extra arm length helps with throwing is that it has a greater moment arm. This requires the projectile to leave at a right angle to the arm, while in a gun the projectile comes out the end.
yes it does engage the rifling. However the lead ball is traveling rather quickly [not sure of the fps] , by maximizing the length of the barrel it puts the greatest amount of spin on the lead ball.
lets say and 8 year old throws a football, he isn't that strong and his arm is short, so it has a spin on it but it isn't that great and the ball goes to the l ...[text shortened]... nger, thus the spin is greater and it stays on target [rifle]
hope that clears things up
Originally posted by AThousandYoungyour right, bad analogy, but best I could come up with on the spot.
Terrible analogy. The "strength" of the bullet comes from the amount of powder, and the reason extra arm length helps with throwing is that it has a greater moment arm. This requires the projectile to leave at a right angle to the arm, while in a gun the projectile comes out the end.