Go back
Guaranteed Overlapping

Guaranteed Overlapping

Posers and Puzzles

r
CHAOS GHOST!!!

Elsewhere

Joined
29 Nov 02
Moves
17317
Clock
09 Nov 05
Vote Up
Vote Down

Is it possible to construct an infinite set of n-element sets, each pair of which has a nonempty intersection, such that there do not exist three sets whose mutual intersection is equal to the intersection of any two of them?

If not, how big do we have to make a set of such sets so that such a triple exists?

C

Earth Prime

Joined
16 Mar 05
Moves
35265
Clock
10 Nov 05
Vote Up
Vote Down

cor blimey. I was feeling sick enough before clicking this thread.

O
Lucky Patzer

Ohio University

Joined
23 Oct 03
Moves
9879
Clock
10 Nov 05
Vote Up
Vote Down

the set could be infinitely large,

r
CHAOS GHOST!!!

Elsewhere

Joined
29 Nov 02
Moves
17317
Clock
10 Nov 05
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Otis
the set could be infinitely large,
Sorry, I was not clear, but you may be right anyway. Such a triplet consists of sets A, B, C such that:

ABC = AB = AC = BC.

Have you got a proof?

V

Joined
08 Oct 05
Moves
723
Clock
10 Nov 05
Vote Up
Vote Down

I don't think it can be infinite.
Consider 2^n n element sets. A1, A2, ...., A(2^n). Now consider the sets A1 intersection Ai i= 1,2,3,...2^n

These are all subsets of A1. But there are only 2^n subsets of A1 (or ant n element set) So if all these interesctions are distint one of them must be the empty set. If they are not distict that is if A1 intersection A2 and A1 intersection A3 are the same then A1 intersection A2 intersection A3 is equal to A1 intersection A2.

Anyone know if (2^n) -1 is the strictest upper bound possible?

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.