1. Joined
    20 Aug '06
    Moves
    1494
    22 Sep '06 01:11
    During WW1 the British army replaced its infantry's cloth caps with steel helmets, but to everyones surprise the number of reported head injuries actually increased.
    Does anyone know why?

    (it might not be WW1, I cant remember where I read this)
  2. Standard memberAThousandYoung
    Insanity at Masada
    tinyurl.com/mw7txe34
    Joined
    23 Aug '04
    Moves
    26660
    22 Sep '06 06:51
    Originally posted by asplandmatt
    During WW1 the British army replaced its infantry's cloth caps with steel helmets, but to everyones surprise the number of reported head injuries actually increased.
    Does anyone know why?

    (it might not be WW1, I cant remember where I read this)
    My guess is that people who would otherwise have been killed by getting hit in the head were injured instead.
  3. Joined
    20 Aug '06
    Moves
    1494
    22 Sep '06 12:04
    Originally posted by AThousandYoung
    My guess is that people who would otherwise have been killed by getting hit in the head were injured instead.
    Yeah.

    I thought this was going to be tough.

    ah well.
  4. Joined
    13 Apr '06
    Moves
    24617
    25 Sep '06 17:19
    what worrying is this was to everyone's surprise
  5. Joined
    11 Nov '05
    Moves
    43938
    25 Sep '06 17:26
    Two cases:
    (1) Without helmet, shot in head : dead and not surprised.
    (2) With helmet, shot in head : injured and surprised.
    Better surprised than dead.
  6. Joined
    13 Apr '06
    Moves
    24617
    25 Sep '06 18:52
    Originally posted by FabianFnas
    Two cases:
    (1) Without helmet, shot in head : dead and not surprised.
    (2) With helmet, shot in head : injured and surprised.
    Better surprised than dead.
    you very presumptious, arent you
  7. Joined
    11 Nov '05
    Moves
    43938
    25 Sep '06 19:17
    Originally posted by mazziewag
    you very presumptious, arent you
    Please, you elaborate...?
  8. Joined
    21 Sep '05
    Moves
    75006
    25 Sep '06 20:18
    Originally posted by asplandmatt
    During WW1 the British army replaced its infantry's cloth caps with steel helmets, but to everyones surprise the number of reported head injuries actually increased.
    Does anyone know why?

    (it might not be WW1, I cant remember where I read this)
    Research carried out in 2006:
    Wearing a cycle helmet increases your chance of being knocked off your bike.
    http://tinyurl.com/h88sa
  9. Standard memberXanthosNZ
    Cancerous Bus Crash
    p^2.sin(phi)
    Joined
    06 Sep '04
    Moves
    25076
    26 Sep '06 06:43
    Originally posted by Diapason
    Research carried out in 2006:
    Wearing a cycle helmet increases your chance of being knocked off your bike.
    http://tinyurl.com/h88sa
    Actually his findings were that cars drove closer to him when he was wearing a helmet. He did not claim that wearing a helmet will increase a person's chance of being hit by a car.
  10. Joined
    28 Jan '06
    Moves
    24604
    27 Sep '06 05:23
    Originally posted by XanthosNZ
    Actually his findings were that cars drove closer to him when he was wearing a helmet. He did not claim that wearing a helmet will increase a person's chance of being hit by a car.
    neither did diapason. He claimed the likelyhood of being knocked off your bike would increase, not being hit by a car.
  11. Standard memberXanthosNZ
    Cancerous Bus Crash
    p^2.sin(phi)
    Joined
    06 Sep '04
    Moves
    25076
    27 Sep '06 11:00
    Originally posted by smomofo
    neither did diapason. He claimed the likelyhood of being knocked off your bike would increase, not being hit by a car.
    Same thing.
Back to Top

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.I Agree