1. Joined
    05 Oct '05
    Moves
    82
    05 Oct '05 16:48
    Seems you all are stuck in the notion of forces.
    If you instead look at the suns gravitation as an alteration of the space
    around the sun, much like a stone would make a bump if placed on a stretched-out blanket, and the earth is a much smaller stone circling the bigger one, what would you then mean by "suddenly switch off" (the impact on the blanket caused by the mass of) the big stone? The question, even if hypothetically put, does not make sense.
  2. Standard memberBowmann
    Non-Subscriber
    RHP IQ
    Joined
    17 Mar '05
    Moves
    1345
    05 Oct '05 17:48
    Originally posted by Birkmoor
    Seems you all are stuck in the notion of forces.
    If you instead look at the suns gravitation as an alteration of the space
    around the sun, much like a stone would make a bump if placed on a stretched-out blanket, and the earth is a much smaller stone circling the bigger one, what would you then mean by "suddenly switch off" (the impact on the blanket ca ...[text shortened]... ed by the mass of) the big stone? The question, even if hypothetically put, does not make sense.
    Another who doesn't read threads before replying?
  3. Joined
    17 Jan '05
    Moves
    3242
    06 Oct '05 01:41

    This post is unavailable.

    Please refer to our posting guidelines.

  4. Coachella Valley,CA
    Joined
    20 Sep '05
    Moves
    469
    06 Oct '05 04:08
    Originally posted by Bowmann
    Don't you have any other hobbies?
    Playing Chess!!!
    how about a game Bowmann.

    Actually I was hoping to be berated by you.
    I like you!
  5. Coachella Valley,CA
    Joined
    20 Sep '05
    Moves
    469
    06 Oct '05 04:48
    Originally posted by Pullhard
    I can't believe the bullshit that gets posted in these forums with such authoritative air. It took Bowmann to explain an elementary aspect of our universe. How embarrassing.
    WARNING: Chronic debating can lead to blindness!

    This should only be attempted by Master-Debaters.
  6. Standard memberPocketKings
    Banned from edits
    Grammar dyslexic
    Joined
    20 May '05
    Moves
    11372
    06 Oct '05 13:33
    Originally posted by Wildfire
    If the Sun's gravity were suddenly "turned off," would the Earth be immediately affected? Or would it take eight minutes (the time it takes for the sun's light to reach Earth)?
    does gravity affect light speed? i don't think it does
  7. Standard memberPocketKings
    Banned from edits
    Grammar dyslexic
    Joined
    20 May '05
    Moves
    11372
    06 Oct '05 13:50
    Originally posted by PocketKings
    does gravity affect light speed? i don't think it does
    but i was never good at science anyway
  8. Standard memberPocketKings
    Banned from edits
    Grammar dyslexic
    Joined
    20 May '05
    Moves
    11372
    06 Oct '05 13:56
    testing
  9. Standard memberPocketKings
    Banned from edits
    Grammar dyslexic
    Joined
    20 May '05
    Moves
    11372
    06 Oct '05 13:57
    testing again
  10. Earth Prime
    Joined
    16 Mar '05
    Moves
    35265
    06 Oct '05 16:34
    Originally posted by PocketKings
    does gravity affect light speed? i don't think it does
    start a new thread. Name it "gravity and light" because it has been shown that gravity can pull light, but what strength is needed?
  11. Standard memberBowmann
    Non-Subscriber
    RHP IQ
    Joined
    17 Mar '05
    Moves
    1345
    06 Oct '05 17:09
    Originally posted by Coconut
    ...gravity can pull light...
    Wrong! There we go with the "force" idea again.

    Light travels through space in straight lines and has no inertial mass to be 'pulled' by anything.
  12. Standard memberBowmann
    Non-Subscriber
    RHP IQ
    Joined
    17 Mar '05
    Moves
    1345
    06 Oct '05 20:32
    Originally posted by Raw760
    Playing Chess!!!
    how about a game Bowmann.
    Ask me in the appropriate forum.
  13. Joined
    06 Jun '05
    Moves
    502
    06 Oct '05 22:32
    My appologies if this has been covered erlyer, but im to lazy to read this entire thread.

    Gravity acording to some theorys is a bending of space, this is why light (which has no mas) can be effected by a black hole, it goes in a straight line, its just that space is bent, there for there is no time needed for gravity to travel, its just "under" space.

    Other theorys have the graviton (string theory for example) and this is far to bizare for me to comprihend, so that might take time to travle. I would loke to point out however that this is a pointles question as gravity cant be terned off, so by braking one rool of the univerce, all the others kinda fall to bits anyway!
  14. Joined
    06 Jun '05
    Moves
    502
    06 Oct '05 22:34
    I would also like to appologise for beeing a little drunk and to lazy to use a spell check

    and wilst im at it, i would like to appologise for gravity in the first place, i know its not my fawlt, but it is an all mighty pain at times (like when i fall of my bike!)
  15. Standard memberXanthosNZ
    Cancerous Bus Crash
    p^2.sin(phi)
    Joined
    06 Sep '04
    Moves
    25076
    06 Oct '05 22:48
    Originally posted by o0Ziggy0o
    My appologies if this has been covered erlyer, but im to lazy to read this entire thread.

    Gravity acording to some theorys is a bending of space, this is why light (which has no mas) can be effected by a black hole, it goes in a straight line, its just that space is bent, there for there is no time needed for gravity to travel, its just "under" space. ...[text shortened]... be terned off, so by braking one rool of the univerce, all the others kinda fall to bits anyway!
    Argh. It's an epidemic.
Back to Top

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.I Agree