1. Standard memberChronicLeaky
    Don't Fear Me
    Reaping
    Joined
    28 Feb '07
    Moves
    655
    25 Feb '09 16:121 edit
    Originally posted by Palynka
    What do you mean by telescoping?
    As Swalbr said, I just mean a(3) = a(3)-a(2) + a(2)-a(1) (+a(1)), where "telescoping" refers to the nonparenthetical phenomenon. I'm not sure where I first heard the term, but it's fairly frequently used, I think.
  2. Standard memberPalynka
    Upward Spiral
    Halfway
    Joined
    02 Aug '04
    Moves
    8702
    25 Feb '09 16:28
    Thanks, both of you. Never heard the expression before. 😕
  3. Joined
    26 Nov '07
    Moves
    1085
    26 Feb '09 09:461 edit
    Originally posted by ChronicLeaky
    Not sure how exciting it is, but...
    It turns out the telescoping solutions are much, much prettier than mine. Primarily because they are correct - I have a habit of getting my less-than's and greater-than's confused. Essentially, I solved b(n) for x then substituted it straight back in whilst getting my lt & gt's mixed up.

    I'll try to rectify it, but going by this weeks current performance I have little hope... 😛
  4. Joined
    26 Nov '07
    Moves
    1085
    26 Feb '09 12:142 edits
    So, round 2:

    (I've decided to use l.e. and g.e. for <= and >= )
    Using the same methods as before, we find x s.t. a(97) l.e. 14 and b(100) = a(100). This gives x g.e. 6.931.
    Now, for n < 100 we have b(n+1) g.e. a(n) + 1 / a(n)
    => a(n) ^ 2 - a(n) * b(n + 1) + 1 g.e. 0
    => a(n) < (b(n + 1) + sqrt(b(n + 1) ^ 2 - 4) ) / 2 for n g.e. 100 and,
    a(n) g.e. (b(n + 1) + sqrt(b(n + 1) ^ 2 - 4) ) / 2 for n < 100.
    Substituting in b(99) = (99 - 1) / x (note that 99 < 100) we have that a(100) g.e. 14.07.

    Ta-da! I'm kinda sure that that works. I can't find an error in it...
Back to Top

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.I Agree