1. Joined
    07 Sep '05
    Moves
    35068
    31 Oct '07 16:47
    Originally posted by Zeddicus
    Exactly - why can't the question say that?
    Because then the question is trivial.
  2. Joined
    12 Jul '06
    Moves
    1089
    31 Oct '07 16:501 edit
    Edit - apologies for ranting. I like this forum with logic/physics/geometry puzzles etc, and it just bugged me to be caught out by a trick wordplay question, which is essentially what this then is. Better trivial than wordplay for me. :-(
  3. Standard memberPalynka
    Upward Spiral
    Halfway
    Joined
    02 Aug '04
    Moves
    8702
    31 Oct '07 20:08
    Originally posted by Zeddicus
    Edit - apologies for ranting. I like this forum with logic/physics/geometry puzzles etc, and it just bugged me to be caught out by a trick wordplay question, which is essentially what this then is. Better trivial than wordplay for me. :-(
    It is a problem of logic, actually. And you've failed.
  4. Joined
    12 Jul '06
    Moves
    1089
    31 Oct '07 20:44
    Originally posted by Palynka
    It is a problem of logic, actually. And you've failed.
    Lol. If you say so. Read through the several topics on the boards and you will see that almost every single person to have reached the wrong conclusion has done so simply because of the incorrect grammar in the question.

    Agree to disagree I guess 🙂
  5. Standard memberPalynka
    Upward Spiral
    Halfway
    Joined
    02 Aug '04
    Moves
    8702
    31 Oct '07 20:54
    Originally posted by Zeddicus
    Lol. If you say so. Read through the several topics on the boards and you will see that almost every single person to have reached the wrong conclusion has done so simply because of the incorrect grammar in the question.

    Agree to disagree I guess 🙂
    I was just being a little provocative. 🙂

    But I don't think it's a question of grammar, but simply a question of not thinking thoroughly how planes take off, before jumping the gun and answering.
  6. Joined
    21 Oct '04
    Moves
    17038
    01 Nov '07 01:281 edit
    Originally posted by Zeddicus
    Lol. If you say so. Read through the several topics on the boards and you will see that almost every single person to have reached the wrong conclusion has done so simply because of the incorrect grammar in the question.

    Agree to disagree I guess 🙂
    Actually the question is not poorly written, Its just that everyone that got it wrong says "the question is poorly written"

    "A plane is on a runway that can move (some sort of treadmill). The plane moves in one direction, while the conveyor moves at the same speed but in the opposite direction. Can the plane take off?"

    The key is "CAN the plane take off?" Answer: YES, of course it can no matter what the treadmill does

    or "CAN the treadmill keep the plane from taking off?" NO, because the treadmill has NO affect on the plane from pulling itself into the air.

    Its not a poorly worded question, Its you guys not thinking it through.

    ** coming from a commercial pilot btw who done thousands of takeoffs, if that means anything 😞 **
  7. Standard memberFrank Burns
    Great Big Stees
    Account suspended
    Joined
    12 Mar '04
    Moves
    10441
    01 Nov '07 23:373 edits
    Originally posted by TheMaster37
    How on earth would it be able to take off?

    There is no lift from the air around the plane since the air isn't moving with respect to the plane.
    If the consideration is to match the speed of the tires to the airspeed required to rotate and take off you are correct, Marsan is wrong. An aircraft on a treadmill would only be matching the roll of the tires (or tyres) to the speed of the treadmill. There would be no forward movement which is required to gain airflow over the wings. As the speed of the aircraft relative to the ground increases so does the speed of the air as it passes over the wings, thus increasing the lift of the wings. It has nothing to do with how fast the tires roll.

    Here's another way to look at it, you are outside walking on a treadmill facing into the wind, matching your steps to the speed of the belt. No relative movement to the world around you. If the speed of the belt increased so that you had to run as fast as you could to match the belt speed, with no relative forward motion, would the wind feel as it were blowing harder on your skin?
    Nope.

    Flyunity's explanation seems a little off. I think he means if the aircraft can overcome the roll of the treadmill enough to gain the airspeed required then sure, it will take off as it is making forward progress and gaining airflow over the wings and other flight surfaces.
  8. Joined
    07 Sep '05
    Moves
    35068
    01 Nov '07 23:47
    Try...to...resist...must...not...get...involved...
  9. Subscribermwmiller
    RHP Member No.16
    Joined
    25 Feb '01
    Moves
    101536
    02 Nov '07 00:44
    We beat this one to death about a year ago. Three seperate threads titled:

    Will the airplane fly?
    The airplane will fly.
    Why the plane takes off in layman' s (my) terms.

    October/November '06.
  10. Standard memberTheMaster37
    Kupikupopo!
    Out of my mind
    Joined
    25 Oct '02
    Moves
    20443
    02 Nov '07 07:02
    There's always room for a good old discussion :p

    I missed the previous three threads so with this fourth thread I learned something 🙂
  11. Standard memberPBE6
    Bananarama
    False berry
    Joined
    14 Feb '04
    Moves
    28719
    02 Nov '07 07:11
    Originally posted by flyUnity
    Actually the question is not poorly written, Its just that everyone that got it wrong says "the question is poorly written"

    "A plane is on a runway that can move (some sort of treadmill). The plane moves in one direction, while the conveyor moves at the same speed but in the opposite direction. Can the plane take off?"

    The key is "CAN the plane take ...[text shortened]... rom a commercial pilot btw who done thousands of takeoffs, if that means anything 😞 **
    Of course it's poorly written. It never definitively says "the plane moves forward relative to the ground" or "the plane is stationary relative to the ground while the wheels turn". When people argue about this question, it's always about whether or not the plane is moving forward and getting air to flow over the wings. They can't agree because the question is crap. Didn't you read the other 40 million posts on this?!? 😕
  12. Joined
    21 Oct '04
    Moves
    17038
    02 Nov '07 11:34
    Originally posted by PBE6
    Of course it's poorly written. It never definitively says "the plane moves forward relative to the ground" or "the plane is stationary relative to the ground while the wheels turn". When people argue about this question, it's always about whether or not the plane is moving forward and getting air to flow over the wings. They can't agree because the question is crap. Didn't you read the other 40 million posts on this?!? 😕
    "It never definitively says "the plane moves forward relative to the ground"

    But the question does ask "Can the plane take off" Answer is definitively yes.

    If I was the pilot of the plane, with the goal to take off, and the treadmill operator tried to prevent me to takeoff, who would win?
    The operator would be powerless to stop me
  13. Standard memberuzless
    The So Fist
    Voice of Reason
    Joined
    28 Mar '06
    Moves
    9908
    02 Nov '07 14:48
    Originally posted by flyUnity

    The operator would be powerless to stop me
    The operator would be able to marginally increase the amount of thrust the engines would have to create in order to take off.

    Consider if the planes engines are off and you turn the conveyor belt on. The plane will move backwards. The plane will have to turn its engines on and create thrust in order to remain stationary due to frictional forces between the wheels and the conveyor belt.

    Beyond that though, the conveyor belt operator can't stop the take off.
  14. Standard memberFrank Burns
    Great Big Stees
    Account suspended
    Joined
    12 Mar '04
    Moves
    10441
    02 Nov '07 18:30
    Originally posted by flyUnity
    "It never definitively says "the plane moves forward relative to the ground"

    But the question does ask "Can the plane take off" Answer is definitively yes.

    If I was the pilot of the plane, with the goal to take off, and the treadmill operator tried to prevent me to takeoff, who would win?
    The operator would be powerless to stop me
    I'm in aviation too and I just don't see it. I would however love to lend an open ear to your explanation. If you would please, PM me and the others can maintain the debate here.

    Thanks in advance,
    Frank
  15. Joined
    21 Oct '04
    Moves
    17038
    02 Nov '07 23:05
    Originally posted by Frank Burns
    I'm in aviation too and I just don't see it. I would however love to lend an open ear to your explanation. If you would please, PM me and the others can maintain the debate here.

    Thanks in advance,
    Frank
    Ok, lets put a winch on the front of the plane that has a cable tied to something stationary like a tree thats on the far end of the runway, now if you would start the treadmill, the plane would go backwards, however hook the winch up to the tree, start winding it up, and the airplane WILL move forward regardless what the treadmill is doing, the treadmill can be going 10 times as fast as the plane, but the winch is still going to pull the plane forward.

    Now replace "winch" to "propeller", and replace "stationary tree" to "stationary air".
Back to Top

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.I Agree