Originally posted by Agergermmm... not sure i even follow your logic...lol...but anyway... no...sorry...it aint 19.
19 (part of the date of your next post which is the next number after that sequence, the other numbers not all following this convention of course 😉 )
I am beginning to think that no-one will actually get this one...
😛
The problem with puzzles of this nature is that they tend to be inductive in nature.
You have to determine the rule from the data, but you never can be certain, owing to the inifinte possibilities that exist, especially if one considers that rules may include arbitrary components.
I'm not saying this one or any other one is, but rules tend to be harder for others to guess than it is for someone to create it, making the crafting of puzzles of proper difficulty difficult.
Originally posted by geepamoogleIn other words, we give up. 😕
The problem with puzzles of this nature is that they tend to be inductive in nature.
You have to determine the rule from the data, but you never can be certain, owing to the inifinte possibilities that exist, especially if one considers that rules may include arbitrary components.
I'm not saying this one or any other one is, but rules tend to be ha ...[text shortened]... it is for someone to create it, making the crafting of puzzles of proper difficulty difficult.
Originally posted by geepamoogleLost me there fella... it was only meant to be a bit of mental excercise.. get people thinking outside the box a little.
The problem with puzzles of this nature is that they tend to be inductive in nature.
You have to determine the rule from the data, but you never can be certain, owing to the inifinte possibilities that exist, especially if one considers that rules may include arbitrary components.
I'm not saying this one or any other one is, but rules tend to be ha ...[text shortened]... it is for someone to create it, making the crafting of puzzles of proper difficulty difficult.
It isn't any magical formula of any sorts.. I though it was just a nice puzzle which would be interesting to people due to its (sorta) connection to the game everyone here obviously enjoys playing - chess
Originally posted by dottewellWell done. I really should have got that as I collect British coins. George II's 33 year reign and George III's sixty year reign are so well known to me that those numbers should have triggered something in my brain.
It's the length of reign of British monarchs (most recent last).